Search for: "In The Matter of the Application of Public Law 16-1995" Results 261 - 280 of 395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 1:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
 The policy behind the “no duty” rule was “that any affirmative defense calling into question the pre-or post-bank closing action of the FDIC are [sic] insufficient as a matter of law because the FDIC owes no duty to the O&Ds of a failed bank either in its pre-failure regulation of a bank or in its post-failure liquidation of the same. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 10:20 am by The Legal Blog
The saving of the High Court's inherent powers, both in civil and criminal matters is designed to achieve a salutary public purpose which is that a court proceeding ought not to be permitted to degenerate into a weapon of harassment or persecution. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
Section § 102(b) provides, in relevant part, that an invention is not patentable if it was "described in a printed publication" more than one year prior to the filing date of the application from which the patent issued. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:56 am by Tomassi Law Associates
On May 2, 1995, Dr Azzopardi had failed to appear when the case was called and the sitting was put off to May 16. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by Joel R. Brandes
Supreme Court granted the plaintiff's application and denied the defendant's motion. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
Of primary relevance here, the district court held the '551 patent unenforceable for inequitable conduct because Abbott did not disclose to the PTO its briefs to the EPO filed on January 12, 1994 and May 23, 1995. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Additional flexibility is provided by Article 2(3), which provides that an offense shall be considered an extraditable offense: whether or not the laws in the Contracting States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; and whether or not the offense is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting… [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:47 am by Steven Hansen
Additionally, the enactment of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA), Public Law 110-314, 122 Stat. 3016, has resulted in new testing and certification requirements for children's products. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
' 36 American Criminal Law Review 87-116 (Winter 1999) at p. 91]. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am by INFORRM
He observed that: “It is more difficult to establish that confidentiality or a reasonable expectation of privacy has gone for all purposes, in the context of personal information, by reason of its having come to the attention of only certain categories of readers: see also R v Broadcasting Complaints Commission ex parte Granada TV [1995] EMLR 16. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Instead, the Government inserted section 12 of the Human Rights Act: this provides that the courts had to have “particular regard” to the right to freedom of expression and could not grant interim remedies unless satisfied that the applicant is “likely to establish that publication should not be allowed”. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Summary judgment is appropriate if the movant can show both the absence of genuine issues of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
The Prime Minister said last week that he was “uneasy” about the development of a privacy law by judges based on the European Convention when this should be a matter for parliament. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Collectively, these critiques of domestic arbitration could be interpreted as suggesting that domestic arbitration seeks to obviate or even subvert public interests and the public realm. [read post]