Search for: "In re: S.A" Results 261 - 280 of 684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
In re Productos Verdes Valle, S.A. de C.V., Serial No. 87110668 (July 25, 2018) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:28 am
The parody requirements as laid down by US law (see the latest case, Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:14 am
In re Cerveceria Primus, S.A. de C.V., Serial No. 87460794 [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:36 pm by The Complex Litigator
(November 26, 2012) considered a significant question: "The question on appeal is whether Gentry was overruled by Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 2:58 am
" Judge Newman pointed to the TTAB's non-precedential opinion in In re Licores Veracruz, S.A. de C. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Olympic Airlines S.A. v The Trustees of the Olympic Airlines S.A. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Olympic Airlines S.A. v The Trustees of the Olympic Airlines S.A. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 5:01 am
Richemont (or Compagnie Financière Richemont S.A., if you want to be formal), is a company that is built on some fairly luxurious brands: Dunhill, Baume et Mercier, Cartier, Chloé, Montblanc, Piaget S.A. and Van Cleef & Arpels float easily into the mind. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:21 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:55 am by admin
In the case Miguel Torres, S.A. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Olympic Airlines S.A. v The Trustees of the Olympic Airlines S.A. [read post]