Search for: "In re First Judicial Cir." Results 261 - 280 of 1,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980), makes clear, the public need not blindly trust judicial processes based on secret records. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:41 am by Beth Graham
” In Re Mirant, 613 F.3d 584, 589 (5th Cir. 2010) (quoting Subway Equip. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:42 am by John H Curley
Excelsior Foundry Co., 56 F.3d 844, 846-47 (7th Cir.1995) (observing that an additional rationale is an arbitrator's susceptibility to ex parte communications, absent the constraint of judicial ethics). [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 3:30 pm
 Or, at a very minimum, to try to prevent such a problem in the first place by inviting intervenors and/or suggesting that existing class counsel obtain co-counsel. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch In re TC Heartland LLC (on mandamus to the Fed Cir. 2015) (read-it: Heartland Mand) An interesting mandamus action was recently filed by the Prof John Duffy and Jim Dabney (both now with Hughes Hubbard) raising the following: Whether 28 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 12:54 pm by Cody Poplin
Cir. 2011); In re Petitioners Seeking Habeas Corpus Relief in Relation to Prior Detentions at Guantanamo Bay, 700 F. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The State contended that its interpretation of the Act was consistent with the Lanham Act, the First Amendment, and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Chicago (7th Cir. 2004) ("Judicial proceedings are supposed to be open…. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2017)(“Like the First Amendment . . . the right of inspectionserves to produce an informed and enlightened public opinion. [read post]