Search for: "Incorrectly Filed v. Incorrectly Filed" Results 261 - 280 of 1,432
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2020, 7:56 am by Paul Rosenzweig
In its most obvious configuration, an encrypted file containing images of child sexual abuse would be scanned before a user could send that file using a communication application. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
After the unsuccessful mediation, Hagel’s attorney filed a notice announcing his withdrawal, incorrectly certifying that no motions were currently pending,1 and incorrectly identifying the client from whose representation he was attempting to withdraw. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Various Claimants v VM Morrisons Supermarkets plc Mr Skelton, a Morrisons employee with a grudge, downloaded payroll data containing personal details of 100,000 Morrisons’ employees (such as names, addresses, NI numbers, salary details and dates of birth), onto a personal USB stick and uploaded this data onto a public file-sharing website. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 12:34 am by Diane Tweedlie
F-V, section 8, second paragraph, and section 8.1, penultimate sentence).1.3 In the present case, the original application as a whole (i.e. including the description and drawings) refers consistently to a single invention, the objective of which is "to provide a method to configure timing resource so that data transmission/reception for D2D communication and normal communication do not interfere with each other" (see e.g. paragraph [0008] of the description as filed). [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:13 am by CMS
The Supreme Court considered that the Court of Appeal had incorrectly tilted the balance of patent law in favour of patentees and away from the public, by providing the patentee with a monopoly which exceeded its contribution to the art. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 11:05 am by Kevin Kaufman
Take the EITC: the Treasury Department recently found that 25 percent of all payments continue to be sent out incorrectly. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:02 pm by Brian M. Wright
The Washington State Supreme Court has rejected the “increased risk” test (elsewhere referred to as the “positional risk” doctrine) in several cases, most recently in Street v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Seuss Enterprises, and Professor Tushnet filed an amicus brief in support of Comic Mix. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian had a piece “Facebook incorrectly removes picture of Aboriginal men in chains because of ‘nudity’”. [read post]