Search for: "Independent Acceptance Co. v. California"
Results 261 - 280
of 424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
Nazaire distinguished himself by arguing that the Georgia court should ignore Judge Wright's sanctions order against Prenda in California BECAUSE GAY MARRIAGE, ranting about Brett Gibbs and that notorious terrorist organization the Electronic Frontier Foundation, suggesting that Patel's court-permitted discovery into Prenda should be cut short because blogs are mean to Prenda and Nazaire, and resorting to mediocre "yo mamma" insults. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
More importantly, public-school education involves a mixture of values and cultural inculcation—that is, teaching children what society wants and needs them to accept—as well as the development in students of intellectual maturity, independence, and the ability to think for themselves. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 12:25 pm
(Dale Carpenter) In the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:36 am
See Keene Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:36 am
See Keene Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:45 am
In short, there’s no duty in California for a publisher to publish anything more about a prescription medical product than it actually undertook to publish.A similar result was reached in Cheatham v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The Big Reason Proponents Are Unlikely to Succeed: Their Petition Rests on Contested Issues of Federal, Rather than State, Law I do not think the California Supreme Court is likely to accept the proponents’ invitation to stop same-sex marriage licenses from being issued. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987),and Dolan v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 3:24 pm
See Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:24 am
Bias v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The EEOC Determined in Mia Macy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
Washington (1942, CA5 La) 128 F2d 466 [x-ray examination using lipoidol]; Riss & Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am
Securing Our Futures 11th Annual State of Indian Nations Address Remarks by Jefferson Keel, President National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Thursday, February 14, 2013 Newseum, Knight Studios, Washington, DC I. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:38 am
Guantanamera Cigars Co., 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1085 (TTAB 2012). [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:51 am
It was thought that everyone was on the same team, even though it was clear from disclosures and other communications that the lawyer hired by the carrier was the lawyer for the carrier.This assumption was, and is, erroneous.As reported this morning in WorkCompCentral news, a pair of state supreme court cases from Montana and Texas are making a distinction between counsel for the carrier, the administrator, and the employer.Texas Supreme Court's decision last June in In Re XL Specialty Insurance… [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Last week, Professor Michael Dorf and I co-wrote a column here on Verdict, in which we described an additional constitutional argument that would provide the President with a path forward. [read post]
