Search for: "J SQUARED, INC." Results 261 - 280 of 500
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
(a)  Infidelity (b)  Hypocrisy (c)  Unamusing (d)  Deceit (19) Who opened new premises in Gray’s Inn Square? [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:45 am
"No, he was thinking of the famous photograph of a sailor kissing a nurse: "V-J Day in Times Square" by Alfred Eisenstaedt. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
In determining whether speech is commercial, courts generally consider three factors: (1) whether the communication is an advertisement; (2) whether the communication refers to a specific product or service; (3) and whether the speaker has an economic motivation for the speech. [6] If all three elements are met, then there is a strong likelihood that the speech is commercial. [7] “Native advertisements” – as defined above – fall squarely within the traditional… [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:21 pm
Given that the speaker is none other than Sir Richard Arnold, Patents Court judge and the source of some of the most interesting IP matters referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union -- including the copyright behemoth of Case C‑406/10 SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd (finished off by Arnold J here) -- the event should be a real treat. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
Carter is hard to square with commentators and precedent and the logic of the law. [read post]
Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, the Court squarely addressed whether commercial speech was protected under the First Amendment.[18] In holding that it was, the Court finally arrived at the definition of commercial speech still applicable today, namely “speech that does no more than propose a commercial transaction. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 7:16 am by MBettman
Transport Inc., 84 Ohio St.3d 293 (1999) (a private employer’s supervisor or manager may be held personally liable for violating R.C. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:30 am by Joy Waltemath
Rather, the employee sufficiently argued that she was prejudiced because had she taken leave instead of working the reduced and remote schedule, her performance issues would not have occurred (Alexander v Carolina Fire Control, Inc, July 25, 2014, Beaty, J). [read post]