Search for: "J. Doe 8" Results 261 - 280 of 6,266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
During his tenure, the Commission adopted a very significant and impactful regulation — rule 146 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).[1] If rule 146 does not ring a bell, do not worry. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Title II does not create a right to information. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
The SEC has frequently used Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, a provision that applies not only to the “sale” of securities but also more broadly to “offers” to sell securities.[6]  While termination of a Rule 10b5-1 plan does not constitute fraudulent conduct within the meaning of Rule 10b-5 because it does not involve an actual purchase or sale of a security, the same issue does not exist with respect to Section 17(a) liability. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The doctrine does not apply where a petitioner challenges a single discrete action, inaction, or decision and the resulting effects, even if continuous, are not intrinsically unlawful (Application of Ayers, 48 Ed Dept Rep 350, Decision No. 15,883; Appeal of a Student with a Disability, 48 id. 146, Decision No. 15,821, art 78 dismissed Matter of Reyes v Mills [Sup Ct, Albany County 2009, Zwack, J.]).I agree with respondent that petitioner’s reassignment was a discrete… [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The doctrine does not apply where a petitioner challenges a single discrete action, inaction, or decision and the resulting effects, even if continuous, are not intrinsically unlawful (Application of Ayers, 48 Ed Dept Rep 350, Decision No. 15,883; Appeal of a Student with a Disability, 48 id. 146, Decision No. 15,821, art 78 dismissed Matter of Reyes v Mills [Sup Ct, Albany County 2009, Zwack, J.]).I agree with respondent that petitioner’s reassignment was a discrete… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:51 am by Jack Bogdanski
Supreme Court does not fully resolve all the issues in this case,” the group said. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
In addition, Alabama asks the justices to overrule Hall and Moore or at least clarify that those cases permit courts to consider multiple IQ scores and the probability that an offender’s IQ does not fall at the bottom of the lowest IQ score’s margin of error. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Craddock, Protecting Prenatal Persons: Does the Fourteenth Amendment Prohibit Abortion? [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Joy
Supreme Court to decide if Trump can be left off 2024 presidential ballotsToronto man charged for allegedly operating illegal pawnshopWayne LaPierre, longtime head of NRA, to step down with trial looming Ohio Judge’s suspension will end his career as elected judge; he coerced pleas, demeaned litigants, court says - Garry J. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Lawlor, 2022 ONCA 645; 2023 SCC 34 (40500) O’Bonsawin J. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Specifically, the Court held that the Clean Water Act does not allow EPA to regulate wetlands near bodies of water unless the wetlands have a “continuous surface connection” to those waters. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
Indeed, training AI models does have some important differences from a public performance of a musical work, so it should differ anyway. [read post]