Search for: "JONES v. BLACK" Results 261 - 280 of 576
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Case Background Chasity Jones (“Jones”), a black woman, wore her hair in short dreadlocks to an interview for a customer service position with a claims processing company (the “Company”). [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 1:46 pm
Tibbs, From Black Power to Prison Power: The Making of Jones v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
I know I flicked the, I flicked the fire (inaudible) lighting my Black and Mild (inaudible). [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 2:53 am by Robin Shea
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Day v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 2:35 pm by Giles Peaker
Jones v Luton Borough Council [2016] EWHC 2036 (Admin) This was a judicial review of a decision by Luton Council Housing Appeals and Review Panel not to offer Mr Jones a tenancy of the property of which Mr J’s late father was the tenant, but instead offer a one bed property. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
The People's Republic of China; Permanent Court of Arbitration July 12, 2016)) and the Black Sea area (see, e.g., here). [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
Our next new relist is Jones v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of yesterday’s grant in Moore v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
The Court of Appeal consisting of Lady Justice Arden, Lord Justice Lloyd Jones and Lord Justice Kitchin (who gave the leading judgment) handed down its decision on this point last Wednesday in Comic Enterprises v Twentieth Century Fox Film [2016] EWCA Civ 455 . [read post]
30 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Last Monday, the Supreme Court decided Foster v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm by stevemehta
  She suffered from sepsis, or blood poisoning, which caused her foot to appear black, and doctors unsuccessfully attempted a revascularization procedure. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:29 am by Lorene Park
Martin—while on medical leave—was fired, not in retaliation for his FMLA leave, but for poor judgment and social media policy violations (Jones v. [read post]