Search for: "Jackson v. Price"
Results 261 - 280
of 441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
Holmes (2014) Fordham Intellectual Property, Media, & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol.25, No. 1, SSRN “Who Pays the Price? [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm
In Gordon Price v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Last week, in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
As a result, other states contend, car prices all over the country are higher than they would be if California were not allowed to implement a standard more stringent than the federal baseline. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm
Assessment in such cases should be carried out under the old CPR 44.4(2) On the same day Warby J heard an application for default judgment in the case of Pirtek (UK) Ltd v Jackson. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
The SEC’s response to the Chamber of Commerce’s petition for review of the Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization rulemaking, whose timing coincided with the imposition of an excise tax on buybacks under the Inflation Reduction Act, at length seeks to refute the Chamber’s First Amendment claims, while also seeking to bolster the rigor of the agency’s economic analysis (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 1:48 pm
Then, in 2013, he spent half a year researching into the effects of the Jackson Review of Civil Litigation Costs on litigation on the PCC, seeking to ascertain whether the reforms achieved the key objectives. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
The retirement has been announced of the distinguished media law silk, James Price QC. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
Jackson, Nicholas A.R. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 3:16 pm
Jackson Women's Health Organization. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:58 pm
Familiar examples, to name just a few, include Justice Harlan's famous dissenting opinion in Plessy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 8:34 am
” “More specifically, the CCPA gives California residents the right to (i) know what personal information is being collected, used, shared, or sold about them, (ii) know whether and to whom their personal information is sold or otherwise disclosed, (iii) access and review their personal information, (iv) opt-out of the sale of their personal information, and (v) non-discrimination in the level of service and pricing despite exercising any of their privacy rights. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:11 pm
Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara), who wrote the legislation. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
Trade Comm’n as Amici Curiae Urging Reversal in Support of Appellant, Jackson, Tenn. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 2:32 am
In the case Kramer v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 6:00 am
He once opposed Roe v. [read post]
