Search for: "John and Jane Doe(s)(2)" Results 261 - 280 of 393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2012, 6:27 am by Susan Brenner
City of San Francisco, et al., supra.Paragraph 11 of the Complaint says the plaintiffs included the ten “John Doe” defendants because they did “not know their true names and/or capacities at” when they filed the Complaint. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 2:32 am by John L. Welch
It ruled that Triumph had established its affirmative defense of acquired distinctiveness, and it dismissed Opposer's Section 2(e)(1) claim.TTABlog comment: I suspect this case will return to the CAFC.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:52 am by Susan Brenner
If hearsay weren’t excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say Jane Doe told him the defendant – Richard Roe – who’s on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 6:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Jane Fonda at age 74, on Fonda's third act. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:23 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Directed by Rob Reiner and featuring an all-star cast that includes Kevin Bacon, George Clooney, Jamie Lee Curtis, Christine Lahti, Jane Lynch, Brad Pitt, Martin Sheen and John C. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:10 am by Steve Hall
Jane Hull disagreed with the board and allowed the execution to proceed. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Mapping Russian Twitter, by John Kelly, Vladimir Barash, Karina Alexanyan, Bruce Etling, Robert Faris, Urs Gasser, and John Palfrey. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm
Non-Ratification of Environmental Treaties: Why Does It Happen and How Do We Cope? [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:59 pm by Lawrence Solum
The sentence "The Westside rapist entered Jane's house" does not involve an attribution of an intention. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 7:02 pm by Mandelman
”   “The Free for Life” In this reality-based comedy, John and Jane Q. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:45 am by John J. Sullivan
”  Now, sometimes there’s a John or a Jane Doe, but we know that those are there as placeholders until the actual party is identified and then named.This leads us to the recent decision in Doe v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
Later, Satals told Jane Doe that he did not want to sentence John Doe to life in a nursing home and sometimes doctors have to make those kinds of decisions. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:39 pm by admin
…” (emphasis added) In other words, it could be defamatory to say “John took the money belonging to Jane”, as much as if you had said “John committed theft under s. 322 of the Criminal Code. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:14 am by Hakemi
…”(emphasis added) In other words, it could be defamatory to say “John took the money belonging to Jane”, as much as if you had said “John committed theft under s. 322 of the Criminal Code. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:17 am by admin
       A planning objective: laying the foundations for an effective city planning regime. 2. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:16 am by Mandelman
”   “Hey, does anybody remember what’s the difference between sound editing and sound mixing? [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am by Susan Brenner
It’s a matter of common sense and fairness.If hearsay weren’t excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say Jane Doe told him the defendant – Richard Roe – who’s on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
” Swan Turton has a report here, as does PA Media Lawyer (subscription required). [read post]