Search for: "Jones v. Billings" Results 261 - 280 of 1,103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm
  Here's what that bill says: "LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST/AB 927, Jones-Sawyer. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  Prorogation is not a “proceeding in Parliament” and therefore not privileged under the Bill of Rights. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Jones (1997) that Bill Clinton was not absolved from responsibility for unofficial conduct; that case alleged that Clinton exposed himself to Paula Jones before he became president. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
Lord Keen QC notes that the author of the article was acting as private individual working for a publication and not in her separate role as an adviser to the Prime Minister. 15:32 Lord Keen QC is discussing the historical process of parliament sitting for 2 or 3 weeks prior to the recess for the conference session in the context of the cabinet memo considering prorogation. 15:30: Lord Keen QC is currently discussing the consideration of bills being carried over when deciding to… [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 6:00 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Friday, August 9, 2019 Tags: Capital formation, Innovation, Investor protection, IPOs, Public firms, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation Finalized Volcker Rule Amendments Posted by V. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
This uncertainty was acknowledged by the Florida Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 7:55 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
  Another privacy class action in Kaplan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm by Vishnu Kannan, Margaret Taylor
Moreover, there are bills relevant to this issue pending in Congress. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:01 am by Vishnu Kannan
Bobby Chesney discussed Justice Stephen Breyer’s analysis of the denial of cert in Al-Alwi v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
In the light of this, it considered that Parliament’s choice to use the wording of “serious harm” could only have represented an intentional departure from the previous decisions in Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 74 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:35 pm by Joe Mullin
The current legal test for patents is not arbitrary or harmful to innovation, Jones argued. [read post]
30 May 2019, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
Jones, which holds that the president is subject to civil lawsuits (thereby allowing Paula Jones to proceed with her sexual harassment case against then-President Bill Clinton). [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
(summary judgment for Citibank on multiple theories of recovery reversed, including breach of contract, where agreement on interest rate applied on billing statements had not been proven).Requirement to prove agreement on credit terms not enforced: Devine v. [read post]