Search for: "Judicial Review Council" Results 261 - 280 of 4,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2014, 2:10 pm by Giles Peaker
It is a refusal to grant permission for Judicial Review of a Council’s refusal to carry out a review of the method it had decided upon to discharge its full housing duty. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:10 pm by Giles Peaker
It is a refusal to grant permission for Judicial Review of a Council’s refusal to carry out a review of the method it had decided upon to discharge its full housing duty. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:12 am by HRWatchdog
Visit CalChamber’s Top Stories for full coverage of the Judicial Hellholes report. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 12:04 pm
The two judges suggest the Judicial Council be restructured to include fewer appointees by the chief justice â€â [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 4:54 am
According to the article, "The 5th Circuit judicial council used a Baton Rouge law firm for its investigation. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 10:40 am
Sullivan will appeal both his 15-day suspension and the findings last month by the Judicial Review Council that he violated the code of ethics in secretly withholding release of a controversial ruling. [read post]
23 Dec 2006, 8:23 am
Four legal scholars who reviewed the judicial council's opinion for The Times said the decision was well-grounded, and they expressed dismay that it had not been made public immediately. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 8:42 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Here are links to some excellent resources found in the Texas Indigent Defense Commission winter newsletter that Grits wanted to preserve for my own purposes:See a press release and Texas Judicial Council resolution supporting recommendations from the Timothy Cole Exoneration Review Commission.See a four-page primer on the Texas Fair Defense Act created for Texas legislators and staff.See the Judicial Council's recommendations regarding… [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:56 pm
But this is by the by as the prime issue was whether the decision was properly subject to judicial review. [read post]
21 May 2021, 12:34 pm by Brian Leiter
From the public announcement: The Review Panel did find...that it was an error for Justice Spiro to raise such concerns [about the faculty... [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:12 pm by WIMS
The Council sought judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), of the Corps' decision to issue a permit for the City's proposed project and the FWS's biological opinion that the project would not adversely modify the critical habitat for endangered and threatened species. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 4:20 pm
Dublin City Council and Others [2008] I.E.H.C. 79, had held that the absence of merits hearing under .s62 did not breach Art 6 or indeed Art 8 rights, given the availability of judicial review. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:44 pm
It would have been better if the author shared his views on the National Judicial Council proposal. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 8:17 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Baltimore County resolution at issue was a legislative act and thus not subject to ordinary judicial review beyond the limited inquiry of whether the County Council was acting within its legal authority in adopting the resolution. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 2:10 pm
Araya, R (on the application of) v Leeds City Council [2009] EWHC 1962 (Admin) was a judicial review of just such a decision on to give notice on existing accommodation and offer an alternative place, which raises a couple of interesting points. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm by Giles Peaker
This judicial review concerned Sandwell Council’s policy of doing just that. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am by Schachtman
A recent editorial in the Annals of Occupational Hygiene is a poignant reminder of how oversold peer review is in the context of expert witness judicial gatekeeping. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 11:01 pm by Josh Blackman
And the Judicial Council "of the circuit" can only step if the district judges are "unable to agree. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:56 pm
A core assessment had not been carried out when judicial review proceedings were issued. [read post]
31 May 2013, 8:58 pm
Consequently, case law has been developed which suggests that a Federal Court does not have the jurisdiction to review SSA’s determination not to extend the period for appeal is not subject to judicial review under § 405(g). [read post]