Search for: "KING v. Davis"
Results 261 - 280
of 397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Rev. 56, 63–66 (2015) (suggesting after King v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Mar. 8, 2006); King v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am
Eight years later, in Davis v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
King, 141 S. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Davis L. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am
” Justice Garland recalled the Court’s precedent in “NBC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Appellate Division, First Department In proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel fee In Kelly G v Circe H, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 6869009 (1stDept.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the… [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Mary Ziegler is the Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:36 am
Paraphrasing Shakespeare’s King Lear, the Lord Chief Justice told Twitter users they are free to say “what they feel” as opposed to only “what they ought to say”. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
Davis, 394 A.2d 1377, 1382 n.7 (D.C. 1978) (if verdicts were determined on the basis of statistics indicating high probability of alleged facts, more often than not they would be correct guesses, but this is not a sufficient basis for reaching verdicts) Kaminsky v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court observed in the context of high school students in Tinker v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:31 am
Lions refer to kings, and while Mike was certainly a king in terms of ability and dedication, he never held himself out to be a bigshot. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
King, 699 F.2d 744, 746 (5th Cir. 1983)("[The plaintiff] is a pro se litigant. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
” http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-1227.pdf Davis v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
Returning relists We begin this week with the sole holdover from last term, which thus begins OT2016 as the new term’s relist king. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics
1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor
Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment
1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William
On Conveyancers' Evidence
1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas
On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
(2) Nike v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm
On Thursday 2 February 2017, Garnham J heard an application in the privacy case of ZXC v Bloomberg LLP. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
, Kings Place, London. 24-25 June 2013, The Constitution of the Public Sphere: the post-Leveson Landscape (W G Hart Legal Workshop 2013), Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, London. 26-27 September 2013, Jersey Law Via the Internet 2013, Radisson Blu Hotel, Jersey. [read post]