Search for: "King v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 2,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2009, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
As the United States Supreme Courthas recently instructed, “‘how the art underst[ands] [a]term . .. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
King Pharmaceuticals (Westlaw cite is 2006 WL 3716920), and the case number is WDQ-04-3521The blog had noted: the Court [in Merck v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 11:08 am
In an Order last week in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 11:00 pm
Consequently, the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in King v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:05 am
Hewett v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 11:00 pm
Consequently, the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in King v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
This is why, for example, testing a defendant’s white powder to see whether it is cocaine invades no reasonable expectation of privacy, under United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 7:58 am
There was, perhaps, some room for argument about what "subject to" meant, but the court cleared that up yesterday in King v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:57 am
” Id. at 891.As stated above, in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:04 am
McKenna (state escrow statute) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlEstate of Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 4:42 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:35 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:32 am
(Citing United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:31 am
The health care subsidy case of King v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:15 am
We therefore vacate the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Spatt, J.) [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:14 am
For all the textual parsing back and forth at oral argument yesterday in King v. [read post]
