Search for: "King v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 2,953
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2015, 12:01 pm
The King v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am
George King of the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order in Pedroza v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 8:53 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
For example, if you ask a state tax officer when were the assessments? [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:24 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
The King Law Reporter will be available on Fastcase.com for free through February 2018. [read post]
Case o' The Week: Bad Cops Make Good Law, Quon -- Fourth Amendment Privacy Interests in Text Content
22 Jun 2008, 3:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
As the United States Supreme Courthas recently instructed, “‘how the art underst[ands] [a]term . .. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 11:08 am
In an Order last week in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 11:00 pm
Consequently, the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in King v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:05 am
Hewett v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 11:00 pm
Consequently, the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in King v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
King Pharmaceuticals (Westlaw cite is 2006 WL 3716920), and the case number is WDQ-04-3521The blog had noted: the Court [in Merck v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 5:15 pm
Finally, unlike with King v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
This is why, for example, testing a defendant’s white powder to see whether it is cocaine invades no reasonable expectation of privacy, under United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 7:58 am
There was, perhaps, some room for argument about what "subject to" meant, but the court cleared that up yesterday in King v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:57 am
” Id. at 891.As stated above, in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
