Search for: "LIVINGSTON V. STATE"
Results 261 - 280
of 547
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
EEOC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 9:07 am
As an initial matter, the appeals court first recognized that Swierkiewicz v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:14 am
This is in response to the recent decision in State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:58 am
Wiggins in Livingston County relying upon Matter of Wallman v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 6:28 am
In this case, the inmate overcomes that hurdle.The case is Alvarez v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:03 am
But state courts over the years have reached different holdings on this issue. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 8:19 am
The plaintiffs sue for false arrest.The case is Garcia v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:51 am
Aaron McCoy v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:19 am
In DeWeerth v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 6:13 am
In Sylvester v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:43 am
In 2000, the Supreme Court said in Buckhannon v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:04 am
The district court threw out the case, but the Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Calabresi and Livingston) reinstates it.The Second Circuit revives the claim under the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
Thus, in R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213 para 165 provides that in discrimination cases there should be a structured approach to the question of justification: “First, is the objective sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right? [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 11:40 am
Livingston, 376 U.S. 543 (1964). [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:04 am
Here is how the Court of Appeals (Parker, Livingston and Droney) sums it up:In District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:05 am
The Second Circuit says the plaintiff has a case.The case is Safepath Systems, LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
” Petrosino v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:09 am
The problem for plaintiff in Castagna v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
In Matter of Livingston Parkway Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:41 am
The remaining judges -- Jacobs, Cabranes, Raggi, Livingston and Droney, dissents. [read post]