Search for: "Little v. Jacobs"
Results 261 - 280
of 459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2014, 1:47 pm
The system is also faulty in that the General Court's rulings on procedural issues result in cases being thrown back to the Boards of Appeal with little indication as to their substantive value. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:54 am
The Court of Appeals doesn't see it that way.The case is McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 2:25 am
On this point, Kitchin LJ relied upon Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 1339. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:51 am
From one of our dearest and most kat-patted friends, the excellent Chris Torrero, comes a link to "Colleges Need Free Speech More Than Trademarks", a fascinating little article by Jacob H. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 6:13 am
At the National Review Online, Scott Gaylord discusses last week’s order in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
On Friday afternoon, the Court issued its much-anticipated order in Little Sisters of the Poor v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
. that by reason of their sheer volume would add little to the effective protection of the public”); Cotton v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:52 am
Selikoff , Jacob Churg, and E. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:28 pm
Apart from writing this guest item, his other moment of fame came when, in L'Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2010] EWCA Civ 535, Lord Justice Jacob cited a piece he co-wrote with Joel Smith in his thunderous critique of the Court of Justice ruling. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
Third, even if the EPO opposition proceedings are concluded in time to affect the English proceedings, the uncertainty and waste of costs involved do little credit to our procedures. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
” See Franciscan Vineyards, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
The CJEU rows back a little from this precipice however,at paras 42 to 43, where probabilities and logic ease the burden of proof]. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:03 am
Jacobs, the Supreme Court appeared ready to draw some lines to cabin the Younger abstention doctrine. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
He first quoted from the well-known statement of Lord Justice Jacob, as he then was, in Technip France SA’s Patent [2004] EWCACiv 381 as to the role of the expert in patent actions. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:50 am
At E&E Publishing, Jeremy Jacobs reports on the grant in Marvin M. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:39 pm
Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:52 am
They also get qualified immunity on the cavity search claim.The case is Gonzalez v. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 6:07 am
In Acosta v Acosta--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3970239 (C.A.8 (Minn.)) [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:14 am
Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
