Search for: "Long v. Richardson"
Results 261 - 280
of 364
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2022, 12:38 pm
” Long v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Spicy IP) Global credit crisis leads to boom times for legal process outsourcing businesses specialising in IP (Spicy IP) Israel Israeli bakery Matzot Aviv files trade mark infringement suit against rival Patisserie Aviv and US importer Bagel Bites (The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office relaxes conditions for modified examination (The IP Factor) Italy Italian Supreme Court recognises ‘post sale confusion’ in criminal proceedings concerning sales of… [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
Julien v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:38 am
V. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:11 pm
Since the Alice v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 11:11 am
Five judges dissented, in an opinion written by Judge Julius Richardson. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
Without dissent, the justices in Porter v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 1:01 am
I have known Bill Coleman for a long time. [read post]
6 May 2007, 2:03 pm
Richardson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:08 pm
Supreme Court in Atkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Richardson, the U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 5:04 am
Richardson (1984), looking back to United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm
Circuit’s order implicates Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
Senior Master Fontaine entered default judgement in favour of Jane Cahane, the ex-editor of The Investigative Journal (TIJ), a London-based news website that claimed to publish objective public interest long-form journalism, following Cahane’s claim that she had been misled about the sites intentions and funding. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In Gill v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Kemp v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
This is particularly true as long as the qualified-immunity doctrine exists. [read post]
