Search for: "Los Angeles v. Superior Court" Results 261 - 280 of 1,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Earlier last year a Los Angeles Superior Court ordered the coffee companies to put cancer warnings on their beverages. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:56 am by Jeff Margulies (US)
Background and current status of Prop 65 coffee litigation This regulation follows an industry-wide litigation brought by the Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT) in which Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle found that coffee roasters and retailers failed to demonstrate that the levels of acrylamide – a chemical formed when coffee beans are roasted – did not pose a significant risk of cancer. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:56 am by Jeff Margulies (US)
Background and current status of Prop 65 coffee litigation This regulation follows an industry-wide litigation brought by the Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT) in which Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle found that coffee roasters and retailers failed to demonstrate that the levels of acrylamide – a chemical formed when coffee beans are roasted – did not pose a significant risk of cancer. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 5:15 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Judge Ann I Jones Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles Central Civil West Los Angeles, CA Dear Judge Jones: You will shortly be asked to approve a settlement in Lavinsky v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 12:00 pm by admin
Southern California Edison, 19STCV03419, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County). [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:13 pm by Anthony Zaller
  A lawsuit filed last Monday in Los Angeles Superior Court by Turner Tenney, a 21-year old gamer known as Tfue, against Faze Clan, his gaming organization. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm by Ad Law Defense
Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, B292416 (Opinion filed 4/16/19). [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm by Ad Law Defense
  It operates commercial bakeries in Anchorage, Alaska; Springfield and McMinnville, Oregon; Billings, Montana; Spokane and Seattle, Washington; Los Angeles, California; and Nampa, Idaho. [read post]
Superior Court of Los Angeles, a landmark decision that dramatically increased the risk of misclassifying individuals as independent contractors. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:52 pm by Nassiri Law
In a case that originated in Los Angeles Superior Court, employees filed a third-party claim for damages against the payroll company contracted by the worker’s employer. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Unlike the Brookings report, the list that follows is not based principally on court documents. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 7:36 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Johnson & Johnson lost a similar case in Los Angeles last year, where a jury delivers a $21.7 million verdict. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 830 cited in those decisions, this is the first published California case holding that CEQA’s 10-day service provision operates as a statute of limitations, which competes with and trumps the 90-day service statute of limitations of Government Code § 65009(c)(1). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]