Search for: "Lower v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 11,817
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2024, 9:15 am
United States (Feb. 27) – Whether a district court can enter a criminal forfeiture order when the time limit specified in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure has already passed. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
And if the lower court’s reasoning were approved, Prelogar contended, it would “leave the United States at the mercy of States that could seek to force the federal government to conform the implementation of federal immigration law to varying state-law regimes. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
United States, 445 U.S. 222 (1980). [3] Dirks v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm
Please note that these figures include only federal court securities suit filings; the numbers do not include securities class action lawsuits filed in state court. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:56 am
V; Marbury v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 4:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm
They do not extend to infringement occurring solely outside of the United States, even if consumer confusion occurs in the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:24 pm
Gulf-Inland, LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Consent To Jurisdiction By Registering to do BusinessIn June of 2023, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court was overturned by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Mallory v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:22 pm
Taking a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol within the first 12 weeks of a pregnancy was already the most common method for abortion in the United States before the Dobbs decision, partly due to its safety record, its lower cost, diminished access to in-person care, and greater opportunities for privacy. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 10:01 am
In Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Nelson, Harvard Law School Businesses in the United States are increasingly supporting regulation and regulators against judicial decisions curtailing agency authority. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
What about lower courts? [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 2:20 pm
United States, 156 Fed. [read post]
