Search for: "Lynch, Appeal of" Results 261 - 280 of 1,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2024, 5:55 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Lynch, Park and Williams [D.J.]) reminds us that "whether the officer had a realistic opportunity to intervene is normally a question for the jury" unless the evidence shows otherwise. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:02 am by Lisa Stam
  Last month, in Soost v Merill Lynch, the Alberta Court of Appeal reduced the lower court award to dismissed stock broker, Kurt Soost, from $2.2-million to $600,000. [read post]
5 May 2021, 5:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The first officer, Loesch, cannot be liable, the Court of Appeals (Katzmann, Lynch and Nardini) says, because there is no dispute that plaintiff refused to interlace his fingers behind his head when Loesch ordered him to do so, "and the split-second decision to bring Bradshaw to the ground and subdue him to eliminate the security risk that the officers believed he posed was not excessive. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:39 pm by Timothy Cornell
  Both sides appealed to the First Circuit. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:15 am by The Public Employment Law Press
NYC not required to make “increased-take-home-pay" retirement contributions for police officers and firefighters appointed after June 30, 2009 Lynch v City of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 04873, Court of AppealsThe bottom line of a very comprehensive opinion in which the Court of Appeals addressed whether Retirement and Social Security Law §480 (b) requires the City of New York (the City) to make "Increased-Take-Home-Pay" (ITHP) pension contributions on… [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 6:05 am
  It gives them a way to return to their districts and prove what a great job they're doing.Hopefully, Lynch's conviction will go before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, where many very smart lawyers (and perhaps even some lawprofs) will assert that the federal government has no business interfering in affairs that only involve the State of California. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 1:21 pm by Steve Statsinger
November 24, 2010) (Newman, Winter, Lynch, CJJ)Defendant Kalish was convicted of mail and wire fraud in connection with an advance loan fee scheme. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 5:18 am by David Oscar Markus
Kyle McEntee and Patrick Lynch are ATL's lawyers of the year. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals (Pooler, Calabresi and Lynch) notes that while Title VII offers no such protections, the State and City laws "expressly protect against discrimination based on both perceived as well as actual sexual orientation. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 6:32 am by Olivia Lynch and Michael Samuels
In this episode, host Olivia Lynch is joined by Michael Samuels to discuss a recent decision from the Small Business Administration’s Office of Hearings and Appeals on the ostensible subcontractor rule as well as a recent Government Accountability Office decision sustaining a protest of an agency solicitation that required a joint venture competing for the award, as opposed to the individual members of the joint venture, to hold a top secret facility clearance. [read post]