Search for: "MATTER OF A B"
Results 261 - 280
of 40,217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2010, 9:52 pm
In order to rectify the matter, we ask that you report A, B, & C. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 6:09 am
The District Court is always free to "reconsider" it's prior decision and change holding on a summary judgment or interlocutory matter, and a 28 U.S.C §1292(b) motion may be just the ticket to get it done. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:54 am
This is why The 1709 Blog has decided to launch a poll asking its enthusiastic readers to answer the following question:DO YOU THINK THAT CLOSED SUBJECT-MATTER SYSTEMS ARE NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE UNDER EU COPYRIGHT? [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:36 am
What subject-matter is patentable? [read post]
24 May 2024, 5:35 pm
Matter of Garcia , 28 I&N Dec. 693 (BIA 2023), followed. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 6:56 am
On Monday, Bob Toth , our guest blogger, discussed 403(b) Service Agreements: “Harmonizing” the 403(b) Plan. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:09 am
This letter ruling is useful for purposes of discussing the criteria that the court will apply to determine whether the court’s decision on one of multiple claims can be treated as final for purposes of allowing an appeal for less than all of the claims in a pending matter, pursuant to Rule 54(b). [read post]
12 May 2018, 8:09 pm
Matter of B. 2018 NY Slip Op 03921 May 31, 2018 Continue reading [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 5:48 am
(Thanks to Michael B. for the pointer.) [read post]
12 May 2018, 8:09 pm
Matter of B. 2018 NY Slip Op 03921 May 31, 2018 Continue reading [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
See also Matter of H-R- , 7 I & N Dec. 651 (R.C. 1958)). [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 10:10 am
Globus argued in support ofthe Rule 50(b) motion that given the overwhelming invalidityevidence presented at trial, judgment as a matter oflaw on invalidity was required even if the court deniedGlobus’s Rule 59(e) motion. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:04 pm
The USPTO is providing this opportunity for public comment because the USPTO desires the benefit of public comment on the Interim Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Examination Instructions; however, notice and an opportunity for public comment are not required under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) or any other law. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:15 pm
Michael B. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:39 am
Code § 3301(b). [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 1:23 pm
True b. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:08 pm
., et al. matter: -"Porcine circovirus type B," "PCVB," "type B porcine circovirus," "porcine circovirus-B," and "PCV-B" -"amplifying said nucleic acid" Wyeth, LLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Since EP 0 364 417 B and the patent in suit claim different subject-matter, the question of double patenting cannot arise. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 9:49 am
The GAO published a decision today in the Matter of SunEdison, LLC, B-298583; B-298583.2, dated October 30, 2006, involving SunEdison’s protest of an award to PowerLight Corporation under request for proposals (RFP) No. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
CLS Section 75-b express states... [read post]
