Search for: "MATTER OF F B"
Results 261 - 280
of 9,076
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
” Nagle, 663 F.3d at 107. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
” Nagle, 663 F.3d at 107. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:29 pm
Subject-matter eligibility under § 101 is a question of law based on underlying facts. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:42 am
The court denied B&B’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law or a new trial. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 10:57 am
***RASMUSSON, 413 F.3d 1318 [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
In Muhlemkamp v Blizzard, 521 F Supp 2d 1140 (E.D. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 1:06 pm
Rule 30(d)(3)(B) allows courts to limit the scope and manner of the deposition. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
United States, 264 F.3d 1089 (Fed. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 12:39 pm
Staples (In re Green), 934 F.2d 568(4th Cir.1991) to determine whether the "totality of the circumstances" demonstrates abuse. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am
On August 16, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio was to hear oral argument in the case of In the Matter of: A.J. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:17 am
The CAFC observed that "[i]f the nature of a proposed mark would not be perceived by consumers as identifying the source of a good or service, it is not registrable," citing TMEP § 1202.04(b) (precluding from trademark protection “informational matter,” such as slogans, terms, and phrases used by the public to convey familiar sentiments, because consumers are unlikely to “perceive the matter as a trademark or… [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 3:55 am
The CAFC observed that "[i]f the nature of a proposed mark would not be perceived by consumers as identifying the source of a good or service, it is not registrable," citing TMEP § 1202.04(b) (precluding from trademark protection “informational matter,” such as slogans, terms, and phrases used by the public to convey familiar sentiments, because consumers are unlikely to “perceive the matter as a trademark or service mark for any… [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 5:33 am
[Rule 6(d)] A party’s ability to notice a judge may be renewed after a case returns to the trial court after an appellate decision [Rule 6(f)] IF (a) the notice had not previously been used; and (b) the appellate decision requires a new hearing. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
A student who is on an F-1 visa could be found inadmissible under INA § 212(a)(3)(B)(i)(IV)(bb) as a representatives of “a political, social, or other group that endorses or espouses terrorist activity”. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 3:11 am
Dunn, Karin F. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 3:21 pm
Or sometimes its just a matter of forum conveniens to plaintiff's counsel. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 1:04 am
CGL - LATE NOTICE - 5-MONTH DELAY UNREASONABLE AS A MATTER OF LAW - NO GOOD FAITH BELIEF IN NON-LIABILITYKaesong Corp. d/b/a Feel Health Beauty Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:18 am
By Rodney F. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
See 33 U.S.C. § 914(f). [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 1:11 pm
Here's how one court made this point-- [Rule 219(b)] requires that the matters asserted be proved and that the opposing party lacked good reasons to deny the request. [read post]
