Search for: "MATTER OF MENTAL HEALTH OF D R S" Results 261 - 280 of 546
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2012, 8:52 am by Gideon
As anyone who’s ever been laid up sick at home for days on end – or someone who’s ever gotten stuck in an elevator or between locked doors in a jail – can attest, the sense of isolation and abandonment seriously distorts our mental health. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:17 pm by Rick
You simply offered to accept the dime — later a quarter — found a phone booth, and dialed the number you’d memorized for those who might actually care. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Even prior, she failed to attend the family team meetings and provide the agency with any information about her compliance with mental health services. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 12:41 pm by Jefferson W. Fisher
Telecommuting offers many mental health benefits, including stress relief and improved work-life balance. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
At times, a court must delicately balance the best interests of the children and their parents with contract rights, religious matters, ethical and social values, and constitutional principles and individual rights. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
At times, a court must delicately balance the best interests of the children and their parents with contract rights, religious matters, ethical and social values, and constitutional principles and individual rights. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:42 pm by Glenn Reynolds
So when I read Guy Winch suggest that airports have “a mental health professional on staff or available as a referral ” for the poor TSA agents who have to grope people day in and day out, all I can think of is that if anything, the airports should have a mental health professional on staff to handle the inevitable situation where a prior victim of sexual abuse is singled out, groped, and melts down right there in the airport security area. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 3:31 am by Russell Knight
“[N]o motion to modify an order allocating parental decision-making responsibilities, not including parenting time, may be made earlier than 2 years after its date, unless the court permits it to be made on the basis of affidavits that there is reason to believe the child’s present environment may endanger seriously his or her mental, moral, or physical health or significantly impair the child’s emotional development. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 2:24 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Respondent presented no evidence beyond the initial mental health reports of any psychological harm to the children. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm by Brianna Rauenzahn
IN THE NEWS President Joseph R. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
The paragraphs contained in Chapter III, Subchapter B of Subtitle D (Forms) of this Title, modified or deleted as may be necessary to conform to the law and facts in a particular action, shall be used in the preparation of ”FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,” ”JUDGMENT,” or ”REFEREE'S REPORT OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
The stated purpose of an article 10 proceeding is Ato help protect children from injury or mistreatment and to help safeguard their physical, mental, and emotional well‑being. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 11:51 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Testamentary Capacity: “It’s a little less amusing when you hear your kids calling it ‘the death tax.'” – New Yorker Cartoon by William Hamilton (2001) “Money-giving is a very good criterion . . . of a person’s mental health. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
Barnes, 14-395, a state-on-top habeas case involving jurors who received third-party religious advice on the death penalty, asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]