Search for: "MAY v. MAY"
Results 261 - 280
of 182,710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am
Continue Reading › The post Can Facebook and other social media companies regulate Speech under the 1st Amendment: Supreme Court may address the issue in Moody v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 7:18 am
So held the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench in Subway Franchise System of Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:46 pm
Holland v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 8:53 am
Morel The post Screenshotting a Newspaper Page May Infringe a Licensed Photo–Hirsch v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:52 am
I'll work my way through those as time allows, but for now, let's look at Magistrate Judge Robert Walker's rulings on Friday in the Verdun-like battle of McIntosh v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
Latif v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Parties may negotiate pre-disciplinary suspension procedures in the course of collective bargainingTransport Workers Union of Greater N.Y. v Bianco, 2015 NY Slip Op 06041, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe Appellate Division said Supreme Court properly dismissed the Transport Workers Union's complaint alleging that the collective bargaining agreement provision setting forth procedures for pre-disciplinary suspensions was void under Civil Service Law §75. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am
On Wednesday 10th May the Court will hand-down judgment in Jalla and another v Shell International Trading and Shipping Company and another [2023] UKSC 16. [read post]
News: Supreme Court will give judgment in privacy injunction case of PJS v News Group on 19 May 2016
16 May 2016, 5:25 am
The UK Supreme Court has announced that it will hand down judgment in the case of PJS v News Group Newspapers Limited at 9.30am on Thursday 19 May 2016. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:41 am
Appointing authority may reject a proposed disciplinary settlementTetro v Safir, App. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:30 am
Ryan v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:22 am
" EnerPol, LLC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 1:12 am
However, on August 25, 2008, in Cable Connection, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 5:29 am
These provocative policy questions at the heart of hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 1:29 pm
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:01 am
” [Jacob Sullum, more, Scott Greenfield, earlier on hate crimes model for “Protect and Serve Act”] Tags: antitrust, attorneys general, Child Protective Services, Illinois, immigration law, McDonald's, movies film and videos, obesity, serial litigants May 30 roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
Jordan v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 8:49 am
” Tretina Printing, Inc., v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 5:59 am
May in Indy! [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:30 am
Destruction of records that may be relevant in pending litigationByrnie v Town of Cromwell Board of Education, CA2, 243 F.3d 93 EEOC regulation implementing Title VII [42 USC 2000e-8(c)] requires “every employer ... subject to this subchapter” to “(1) make and keep such records relevant to the determinations of whether unlawful employment practices have been or are being committed, [and] (2) preserve such records for [two years]. [read post]
