Search for: "MONROE v. US "
Results 261 - 280
of 703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2017, 3:59 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 9:46 am
Monroe Co. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:35 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Troy Monroe v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:40 pm
City of Monroe. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 11:04 am
Shands v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Endorsement by Monroe means something v. different from endorsement by ABG but courts have refused to distinguish those things. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
See City of Monroe Emples. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 1:28 pm
Bailey v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 5:19 am
That brings us to her motion to suppress the cell-phone information. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:44 am
According to the plaintiffs, the installation of this equipment deprived them of the physical use, possession, and enjoyment of that portion of their property (see Weaver v Town of Rush, 1 AD3d at 923 [noting that a de facto taking by one having condemnation powers constitutes a permanent interference with an owner's physical use, possession, and enjoyment of property]; Feder v Village of Monroe, 283 AD2d at 549; Sarnelli v City of New… [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:35 pm
INS v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 12:41 pm
Vasquez v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 12:41 pm
Vasquez v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 1:22 pm
Written by Jim Eckert, Assistant Monroe County Public Defender [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:18 am
In his April 8 decision in the case of Bingham v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 11:15 am
Earlier this year, the Superior Court upheld a non-owned, regularly used vehicles exclusion in its nonprecedential decision in the case of Erie Insurance v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:58 am
Would “Catcher in the Rye v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:48 pm
"Giving us some examples of English copyright cases in the musical field, Sir Robin started with the case of Francis Day & Hunter v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 1:16 am
Sewell v Monroe City School Board 18-31086, a case considering an annual Medicare Health provider compensation formula, where two provisions of the law irreconcilably conflict but judges wish to construct faithfully to the text of the statute. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:57 pm
Northland Family Planning Clinic, Inc. v. [read post]
