Search for: "Major Jonathan Williams" Results 261 - 280 of 692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the 1992 and 1996 races, Ross Perot drained votes away from the major candidates, and twice denied Bill Clinton an overall popular majority of national votes. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
He is a co-author, along with William Cohen and Jonathan Varat, of a major constitutional law casebook, and a co-author of several volumes of the Wright & Miller treatise on federal practice and procedure. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:01 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Zycher offers a final rejoinder here, where he also responds to reply essays by Patrick Allitt, and William Dennis. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:01 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Zycher offers a final rejoinder here, where he also responds to reply essays by Patrick Allitt, and William Dennis. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm by Wolfgang Demino
--> 2018 Elections to bring major shack-up to the Houston Courts of Appeals  ---> Partisan complexion the Texas Intermediate Court of Appeals to Change January 2019Justice Harvey Brown is one of them. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
This three-part series looks at intriguing constitutional questions raised by California’s statutory enactment of SB 826, which requires publicly held corporations with principal executive offices located in California to have a prescribed number of women on their boards of directors. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”  The report said that Fin4 was targeting the email accounts of top executives, lawyers and others in an effort to obtain non-public information about merger and acquisition deals and major market-moving announcements. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Certainly within the business world there is not the consensus on this question that there seems to be among law school administrations, the overwhelming majority of which supported Michigan’s position in Grutter. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm by Green, Schafle & Gibbs
Jonathan William Iraggi (CRD #5857254, Ocean, New Jersey) Without admitting or denying the findings, Iraggi consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that he exercised discretion in customer accounts without obtaining written authorization from the customers or acceptance by his member firm. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
We say “seemingly” because Fullilove was a splintered ruling in which there was no majority opinion clearly laying out a standard of review. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The ERA three-year extension is an easy one to reject, because only simple majorities of both houses enacted the extension, whereas two-thirds majorities had provided for the original seven-year timeline. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 4:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
" — Thomas Chatterton Williams, The New York Times Book Review (cover review and Editors' Choice selection) "Rising intolerance for opposing viewpoints is a challenge not only on college campuses but also in our national political discourse. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Photographed around 1891 It was approved on July 4, 1898 and signed on July 7 by President William McKinley. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”The Concessions Made by Those Who Object to Specific Questions Already Prove Too MuchOn top of all this, the fact that everyone seems to concede that nominees can and should talk about their own past statements and writings about specific cases (from the bench or elsewhere) in front of the Senate devastates any objections to asking nominees their views about all past cases, from all major courts. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm by Timothy Zick
., Professor of Law at William & Mary Law School. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:03 am by Kal Raustiala
William Goldman famously said about Hollywood that “nobody knows anything. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Casey, a majority of the Supreme Court explained why it was retaining the “essential holding” of Roe v. [read post]