Search for: "Mark Hudson" Results 261 - 280 of 726
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
Daughan’s Revolution on the Hudson and Eric Lee’s Operation Basalt: The British Raid on Sark and Hitler's Commando Order.Also in the New York Times, one can read about Carlos M. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 7:43 am by Kevin Denny and Jodie Herrmann Lawson
  Notably, the redlining allegations against BancorpSouth largely track those against Hudson City Savings Bank (Hudson City), which, as we reported, settled similar charges in late 2015. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Congratulations to Professors John Hudson and Lorna Hutson, co-directors of University of St Andrews’s Centre for Mediaeval and Early Modern Law and Literature, upon their election to the British Academy. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:35 pm by Orin Kerr
As Anthony Amsterdam once put it, attenuation marks “the point of diminishing returns of the deterrence principle. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Borrowed from Rehnquist dissent in Central Hudson.) [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 RT: same move is made in In re Tam: §2(a) disparagement is subject to strict scrutiny b/c it’s not commercial speech, but the deception bars in §2 are totally ok because Central Hudson. [read post]
15 May 2016, 12:27 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Mark Hudson said it's not worth it to issue a citation or arrest a suspect who would likely be immediately released because of overcrowding. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm by Jason Rantanen
Griswold is a Consultant residing in Hudson, WI and was formerly President of and Chief Intellectual Property Counsel for 3M Innovative Properties Company. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 RT: Three things: (1) In re Tam: that is dependent on Reed and is a commercial speech case despite claims to the contrary; to see that it is, look at why the majority says it’s ok to uphold the bars against deceptive and confusing marks while striking down disparagement: b/c Central Hudson says misleading commercial speech can be banned entirely. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
We could place this dispute in (1) or (2) of Central Hudson. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Intermediate scrutiny became de facto strict over time and we object to that; now we’re entering to a place w/an uneasy mixture of content neutrality and Central Hudson, which has not been overruled. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:40 am
Hudson Jr. has an article headlined "States seek to stop voters from posting ballot selfies. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm by Mark Astarita
., Trading and Order Management, E*Trade Adam Nunes, Head of Business Development, Hudson River Trading 11:30 a.m. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 9:16 pm by Cody M. Poplin
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Monday, April 4th at 12 pm: The CATO Institute will host John Mueller and Mark G. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 5:14 pm
Hudson Jr. has an article headlined "SCOTUS antitrust ruling against dentists raises questions about lawyers' regulatory structures. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
House of Representatives, Assistant to the Speaker for Policy)Christopher DeMuth (Hudson Institute)Robert Glicksman (George Washington University Law School)Adam White (Hoover Institution; Co-Chairman, Section’s Committee on Judicial Review)Moderator — Jeffrey Rosen (Chairman, ABA Section of Administrative Law)5:30pm - 6:30pm: ReceptionKeynote Speaker — Senator Orrin Hatch [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:00 am by Dan Ernst
House of Representatives, Assistant to the Speaker for Policy)Christopher DeMuth (Hudson Institute)Robert Glicksman (George Washington University Law School)Adam White (Hoover Institution; Co-Chairman, Section’s Committee on Judicial Review)Moderator — Jeffrey Rosen (Chairman, ABA Section of Administrative Law)5:30pm - 6:30pm: ReceptionKeynote Speaker — Senator Orrin Hatch [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
Hudson Jr. has an article titled "Federal appeals courts split over law on credit card surcharges. [read post]