Search for: "Martin v. Powers" Results 261 - 280 of 1,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am by Florence Plisner (Bristows)
Given that the only authorised use of linagliptin is for the purpose specified in the claim (as part of a product containing excipients), this was a powerful factor in determining the circumstances were in place to ensure that linagliptin would be used for that purpose and that Boehringer knew it would be used exclusively for that purpose. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:07 pm by Peter Roberts
  Parens patriae jurisdiction is a power exercised by the courts for the protection of those who cannot care for themselves. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 11:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reminds IPBiz a bit of Game 7 of Mets v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 3:46 am
Martin of Sundahl, Powers, Kapp & Martin, LLC, Cheyenne, Wyoming. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 6:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
Richland of Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland in Los Angeles. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
An injunction is a powerful tool wielded by the courts, but one that should be applied sparingly. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Martin, Devisee of Fairfax (which produced the decision reversed in Martin v. [read post]