Search for: "Maryland v. King" Results 261 - 280 of 472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am by Matthew Lanahan
King, another privacy case in which the Court upheld a Maryland law authorizing law enforcement officials to collect DNA samples from individuals arrested for “serious” crimes. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:16 am by Joe Patrice
Justice Stevens defends the decision in Maryland v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:24 pm
The defendant is a New York State Assemblyman and a chairman of the Executive Committee of the Kings County Democratic Party (KCDC). [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 6:04 am by Staci Zaretsky
[Bloomberg] Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: ABA, American Bar Association, American Bar Association / ABA, Biglaw, Department of Justice, DOJ, Equal Pay, Equal Pay Act, George Zimmerman, Job Searches, Law School Graduates, Law Schools, Maryland v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm by Cicely Wilson
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Supreme Court Ruling a Blow to Genetic Privacy The Supreme Court's 5-4 Maryland v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm by Tejinder Singh
The most significant news from the Court this week is its five-to-four decision in Maryland v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 8:15 am
Alonzo King was arrested April 10, 2009 for menacing a group of people with a shotgun and charged with first- and second-degree assault. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:03 am by Allison Trzop
Court watchers continue to discuss Maryland v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 5:53 am by Matthew Lanahan
Monday’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]