Search for: "Matter of Grand Jury Proceeding (Doe)" Results 261 - 280 of 853
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The second article of the House’s impeachment resolution charges President Trump with obstruction of Congress. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 7:23 pm by Melanie Fontes
  Neither Congress nor President Jefferson cared for how partisan the Supreme Court and grand jury statements had become. [read post]
Clinton’s impeachment, there was no dispute that he had committed the federal crime of lying under oath to a grand jury. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
District Judge in Mississippi who had been criminally convicted—of making false statements to a federal grand jury—and sentenced to prison. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
Also in the US,a  Grand Theft Auto V 'cheat maker' was been ordered to pay $150,000 in copyright damages: Rockstar Games' parent company Take-Two Interactive won a default judgment against the developer of the GTA V cheat maker "Elusive". [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
“After reviewing historical and legal precedent, we conclude only that presidential immunity does not bar the enforcement of a state grand jury subpoena directing a third party to produce non‐privileged material, even when the subject matter under investigation pertains to the President,” the Second Circuit held. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 4:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
The grand jury grows out of suspicions about how the President may have used his business firms in transactions designed to help him get elected. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
In response to Goldsmith, Benjamin Wittes argued first that Goldsmith’s argument would lead to an absurd conclusion: If the clear statement rule applied to the perjury statute, which also doesn’t by its terms apply to the president, the president could lie to a grand jury, which would have “come as a surprise to Bill Clinton. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am by Marty Lederman
Vance is the least significant of the cases because the information Mazars provides to the grand jury will almost certainly stay in the grand jury:  Just as under federal law, New York law mandates strict secrecy with respect to matters and information before a grand jury. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The country is in the midst of impeachment proceedings against a president for the third time in modern history. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 11:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
“After reviewing historical and legal precedent, we conclude only that presidential immunity does not bar the enforcement of a state grand jury subpoena directing a third party to produce non‐privileged material, even when the subject matter under investigation pertains to the President,” the Second Circuit held in Trump v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:17 am by Jonathan Holbrook
What impact does the grand jury’s verdict have on the underlying case? [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am by Steve Vladeck
The proceedings below The Vance case arises out of a subpoena issued by New York County (Manhattan) District Attorney Cyrus Vance to Mazars for financial records as part of an ongoing state grand-jury proceeding that, as the U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 10:44 am by Steve Lubet
There is no Sixth Amendment right either to witness confrontation or a public hearing at the grand jury stage, where the proceedings are secret according to statute. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Bottom line is that while there is a grand jury proceeding in state court that is dealing with these possible criminal acts, the federal court has authority to take up the issues raised in this case. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
Importantly, my paper also provides the theoretical basis to understand why executive privilege does not apply to impeachment. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:09 am by John Floyd
The juror served on the grand jury which found the indictment. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Legal Team Says It Represents a Second Whistle-Blower Over Trump and Ukraine MSN – Annie Karni and Nicholas Fandos (New York Times) | Published: 10/4/2019 An intelligence official with “firsthand knowledge” has provided information related to President Trump’s dealings with Ukraine and is now protected from retaliation as a whistle-blower, lawyers representing the official said, confirming a second individual has come forward in the matter. [read post]