Search for: "Matter of Paul T."
Results 261 - 280
of 6,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Ethics Commission records indicated Stacey Brenner received more than $174,000 for lobbying efforts for a hotel project while her husband, Shawn Bayliss, was working as the planning and land use deputy for then-Councilmember Paul Koretz. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 3:41 am
Billionaire bud Paul Singer didn’t have to give Alito anything and he still would have had his vote. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
” If none of this seems to make sense, it is because it doesn’t. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
Now, Justice Alito has taken matters into his own hands. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Per the Court, the “kind of message matters in assessing confusion because consumers are not likely to think that the maker of a mocked product is itself doing the mocking. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm
La notificación de concentración económica, al ser una manifestación del derecho constitucional de petición, debe ser resuelta por el órgano resolutivo de la SCPM dentro del término legal correspondiente. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
My conscience compels me in this matter to vote aye. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 12:48 pm
"We have the receipts" has become a cliche precisely because the presence of documents matters so much. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
For speech about suicide to be unprotected, "[i]t is not enough that [Decedent's] suicide may have been the result of an unreasonable reaction to the [speech]; it must have been a specifically intended consequence. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 6:43 am
” “The primary Paul Hastings lawyer working for Coke, Jonathan Drimmer, handles human rights matters around the globe. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Michener, and T. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:56 pm
Whether the court will ultimately agree with the plaintiff (and the FTC’s position on the matter) remains to be seen. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 2:17 am
Judges should be granting permission to transfer up to the High Court as a matter of course, given the current circumstances. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:02 am
Paul (1992) ("Content-based regulations are presumptively invalid. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:46 pm
He insisted on £130 per gun, equivalent to £27,258 today, or $34,174–too much for a government that already couldn't make ends meet. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 10:45 am
The court concludes that this isn't made sufficiently clear. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 7:41 am
It is okay to rob Peter to pay Paul…so long as Peter gets paid back eventually. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 12:02 am
Paul Mercury Ins. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:53 am
He insisted on £130 per gun, equivalent to £27,258 today, or $34,174–too much for a government that already couldn't make ends meet. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:35 am
This is explained by Professor Paul Wragg here. [read post]
