Search for: "Matter of Smith"
Results 261 - 280
of 10,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
So far, just one judge has ruled on this matter. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 3:49 pm
The SB 8 Defendants have not moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:59 am
The fact of the matter is that everything Jack Smith has done as Special Counsel, since his appointment on November 18, 2022 has been unconstitutional and is null and void. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:19 am
SEC, December 19, 2023, Smith, J.).Default rule is vacatur. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:18 am
TRUMP-RELATED LEGAL MATTERS Colorado’s Republican Party said that it will switch from a primary to caucus system in the upcoming presidential nominating process if the state’s Supreme Court ruling holding that Trump may not appear on the ballot stands. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
Smith to be a Special Counsel with the power of one of the 93 U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:32 am
The SRA kindly posted videos and resources from its recent event: “Compliance Officers Virtual Conference 2023” — VIDEO: “Anti-money laundering – what your firm needs to know“ Anti-money laundering guidance Client and matter risk template Client and matter risk assessments (Many more videos and resources worth a look, via the top link) Travelers Insurance shares: “UK: What’s Behind Large Losses in Law Firms? [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:35 am
The matter is now before both the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
The resolution authorizing the inquiry specifies no subject matter beyond saying that it can include matters described in a Sept. 27, 2023 memo by Committee Chairs James Comer (R-KY), Jim Jordan (R-OH), and Jason Smith (R-MO). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
In Matter of Smith v City of Norwich, 205 AD3d 140 the Appellate Division held that in the event an administrative determination is made where an evidentiary hearing is not required by law, court review is limited to whether the administrative determination had a rational basis and was not arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
In Matter of Smith v City of Norwich, 205 AD3d 140 the Appellate Division held that in the event an administrative determination is made where an evidentiary hearing is not required by law, court review is limited to whether the administrative determination had a rational basis and was not arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:34 am
TRUMP-LEGAL MATTERS Special Counsel Jack Smith petitioned the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 4:39 am
It does not matter that the invisible hand is giving your store or your city the finger as citizens go elsewhere. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
Such hearings are serious matters in Michigan and should not be viewed as trivial. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Beck of the Philadelphia office of the Reed Smith law firm for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:19 pm
It didn’t matter to Trump. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:41 am
Making red lives matter: Public choice theory and Indian Country crime. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
Rohl, Ray Smith, and L. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am
See Maitland Smith’s use of it’s trademark as part of the trunk’s design below: Reg. # 3814156 (Canc.) [read post]