Search for: "Matter of T S B" Results 261 - 280 of 19,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In such a situation the introduction of this ground for opposition can result from the fact that the reasons for the decision contain substantiated statements regarding that matter.[2.4] In point 3.3 of its decision the OD refers, in an unambiguous and sufficient way, to the legal and factual framework of the ground for opposition according to which the skilled person can “can carry out” (thereby implicitly mentioning [the German version of] A 100(b)) a waterstop device… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:24 am by Jim Pravel
See, e.g., State Street, 149 F. 3d, at 1373; AT&T Corp., 172 F. 3d, at 1357. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The OD came to the conclusion that the invention claimed in the proprietor’s 3rd auxiliary request, which corresponds to the appellant proprietor’s 2nd auxiliary request in appeal, involved an inventive step even when starting from A0 (decision under appeal, reasons E4). [6.4.2] It is however the established case law of the boards of appeal that it is not allowable to base the assessment of substantive patentability (novelty and inventive step) upon… [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:47 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In this appeal in opposition, the Board considered it to be within the board's discretion not to admit auxiliary requests which define subject-matter "diverging" from subject-matter of higher ranking requests, including those requests which, in essence, were filed during first-instance proceedings and re-filed with the respondent's reply, but were not examined by the first-instance department. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Litman was in law school b/t Inwood and Two Pesos. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:15 am
That's ANYONE in the action you started or any future litigation in the entire state. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
adjusting the dry matter content of the sol. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:45 am
Addressed to white parents, it warned: “Don’t let your daughter date blacks, it might be a matter of life and death. [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am by Diane Tweedlie
The appellant (patent proprietor) lodged an appeal in the prescribed form and within the prescribed period against the decision of the opposition division to revoke European patent No. 2 159 174.The opposition of opponent/respondent I had been filed against the patent as a whole and was based on the grounds of Article 100(a) EPC (lack of novelty and lack of inventive step), Article 100(b) EPC (insufficiency of disclosure) and Article 100(c) EPC (unallowable amendments).The intervention of… [read post]
11 May 2018, 6:04 am by Diane Tweedlie
The appellant (patent proprietor) lodged an appeal in the prescribed form and within the prescribed period against the decision of the opposition division to revoke European patent No. 2 159 174.The opposition of opponent/respondent I had been filed against the patent as a whole and was based on the grounds of Article 100(a) EPC (lack of novelty and lack of inventive step), Article 100(b) EPC (insufficiency of disclosure) and Article 100(c) EPC (unallowable amendments).The intervention of… [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 3:15 am by Steve Brachmann
., affirming a district court’s findings that claims from two patents that were asserted in an infringement case filed by Glasswall were directed to unpatentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. [read post]