Search for: "Myers v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
In that setting, the United States admitted that the judge's conduct was improper. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:15 am by Ann Hodges
The United States, in contrast to most developed countries, has adopted a system of exclusive representation. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 7:37 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Additional Resources: Alcohol-Impaired Driving Among Adults – United States, 2012, Aug. 7, 2015, CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report More Blog Entries: Kimminau v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:36 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
” Serving as Solicitor General of the United States; resolving conflicts among departments about and developing the legal position of the United States; contrasting the Solicitor General’s office and the Office of Legal Counsel; engaging the president to decide the legal position of the United States; being a legal advisor in the White House; the value of political service to the independence of legal opinions, why winning Bush… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 1:04 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Wednesday 15 July the Court will hear the appeal of The United States of America v Nolan regarding the appellant’s redundancy following the closure of her US military base, RSA Hythe. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
  The Supreme Court’s Bauman opinion was a game changer, and after the false state of Bristol-Myers Squibb, we were pleased with the California Court of Appeal’s opinion in BNSF Railway v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
 Floyd LJ has roundly rejected Arnold J's reasoning, stating:58.The difficulty I feel with endorsing this reasoning is as follows. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm by Sean Hanover
United States, 390 U.S. 377, 384 (1968)4. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:32 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
The Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals recently, in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  Cars are simply too far afield, so even for a United States Supreme Court decision, we won’t dilute the drug/device nature of our list that much.1. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]