Search for: "PFIZER INC, A corporation"
Results 261 - 280
of 339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 6:00 am
Holdings, Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:35 am
., Beckman Coulter, Bridgestone Americas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cargill Incorporated, Caterpillar, Cephalon, CheckFree, Corning, Dow Chemical, Eastman Chemical, Electronics for Imaging, E.I. du Pont (DuPont), Eli Lilly, ExxonMobil, General Electric, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Henkel Corporation, Hoffman-La Roche, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Monsanto, Motorola, Novartis, Patent Café.com Inc., Pfizer, Procter… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:54 am
Centro Adelante Campesino was administratively dissolved on September 29, 2009, by the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) for failure to file a mandatory annual report. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:46 pm
(now part of Pfizer, Inc.), also sought government permission to put out its own generic version of K-Dur. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:58 am
The petitioners have asked the SEC to stay the Nov. 15 effective date of the rules pending conclusion of the litigation.Chief Justice to Hear Pfizer Cases After Selling Company's StockThe Associated PressChief Justice John Roberts has sold his shares of Pfizer Inc., a move that allows him to participate in two pending Supreme Court cases involving the pharmaceutical maker. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Blistex, Ciba, Pfizer, 3M, Edgecraft, Darex, Cisco, Bunn-O-Matic, Oreck, Novartis, Merck, etc. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Blistex, Ciba, Pfizer, 3M, Edgecraft, Darex, Cisco, Bunn-O-Matic, Oreck, Novartis, Merck, etc. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Opinion below (7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-34 Title: Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 11:07 am
``I see McCain as a man who strikes an independent course.''For now, the drug industry is backing Obama because of a perception he is the likely winner and because of McCain's criticism, said Peter Rost, who was a vice president of marketing at New York-based Pfizer Inc. until he was fired in 2005. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 2:37 pm
Lower middle class residents sought to prevent the City of New London Connecticut from taking their property via eminent domain as the owners argued the property was not being taken for "public use" as required by the 5th Amendment.Our antagonist in this story, Pfizer, Inc. wanted to build a large scale commercial development, and seizing the property of private homeowners was necessary to achieve Pfizer's goal. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 2:56 pm
Morgan client. [20] "Really effective successful corporate lawyers have to think like CEOs of Fortune 500 corporations who are their clients," says Kelly, "... [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 5:10 pm
In addition, the drug manufacturer Pfizer paid approximately $23.85 million to resolve claims that it used a foundation as a conduit to pay the co-pays of Medicare patients taking Pfizer drugs. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
The corporate representative was "not responsible" for the conduct of the surgery. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 10:00 pm
Pfizer, 232 F.R.D. 360 (C.D. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
Rodriguez (Patry Copyright Blog),KSR and the doctrine of equivalents: (The Fire of Genius),PLI poll results - 68% say eliminate rule 56: (PLI),Design patents - controlling pendency: (Patently O),USPTO to halt weekly paper publication of USPTO Practice and Procedure Notices: (Patent Docs) AT&T - Vonage to settle with AT&T in patent infringement dispute: (Ars Technica),eBay - US District Court finds eBay intentionally… [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Wyeth, Inc., 850 N.W.2d 353 (Iowa 2014). [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
As readers will know, this defence has been removed for corporate persons as a result of last year’s EU trade mark reform. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 5:29 am
(based in New Jersey); Chattem, Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:10 am
Pfizer, Inc., 507 F.3d 720, 728-30 (1st Cir. 2007). [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Pfizer Canada Inc., 2018 FC 443, reversed 2018 FC 956 – The Prothonotary denied a motion on consent for issuance of a protective order on a similar basis as in Live Face on Web. [read post]
