Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 261 - 280
of 4,537
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 12:35 pm
This is the precise inquiry that cases such as IPO have required, and it clearly meets the standard we outline above, particularly given the depth of the district court’s review, the evidentiary posture of the case as a Title VII pattern and practice case, and the underlying procedural standard where the district court here was reviewing evidence under Rule 23(a)(2), to raise a common question, rather than, like the cases Wal-Mart cites, Rule 23(b)(3), to determine… [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:37 am
Lenz v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:13 am
Prysock, the court observed that “no talismanic incantation” of the “precise formulation of warnings” is required, and reiterated that eight years later in Duckworth v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 2:03 pm
The Supreme Court has also been asked to consider whether the Patent Trial and Appeals Board should use the standard of common sense and knowledge of a skilled artisan to gauge the obviousness of a patent in the case Google v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:23 am
Quesada v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 11:20 am
Bus. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:07 pm
In Halo v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 7:48 am
The case Alcon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 3:27 am
Valderrama, however, did not use the EEOC form. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:06 am
North West Neighborhood Association v City of Boise, 2023 WL 5761372 (ID 9/7/2023). [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:40 am
So I find it rather funny that in Isip v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 8:12 pm
The ADA standards for access to physical places are “objective,” “precise” and “thorough. [read post]
25 May 2021, 5:01 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 11:41 am
The court said that gross negligence is not an exact concept capable of precise definition. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 6:18 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:54 am
The FRAND rate Decision in TCL v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:54 am
The FRAND rate Decision in TCL v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
In Smith v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Thus, for exmple, in David v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 7:23 am
Wilkie, the Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether the doctrine of deference to agency interpretations of their own regulations should be discarded — or more precisely whether Auer v. [read post]
