Search for: "Paris v. Feder"
Results 261 - 280
of 702
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2020, 9:54 am
| Sheeran v Chokri Part 2: Admission of similar fact evidence | New Year, Same Creative Authorship Requirement in US Copyright | Reader discount for IPKat book award titles! [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 5:30 pm
Did the FTC’s “Jerk.com” Complaint Just Turn API Terms Into Federal Law? [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:44 am
Meanwhile, if the tabloids are correct, my neighbor Teodoro Obiang is hanging out in Malibu at his multi-million dollar hilltop estate overlooking the Pacific Ocean, driving Bentleys and Lamborghinis, and jetting off in his $34 million dollar Gulfstream V to his other homes in Cape Town, Buenos Aires and Paris. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:59 pm
See Otter Products LLC, v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:28 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:01 am
A couple of months ago, the Federal Circuit vacated in part, reversed in part and remanded TCL v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:19 am
The May 3, 2011 Tax Court of Canada decision in Snively v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Certainly Roe v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
(quoting Cornwell v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 7:17 pm
Google, a case initiated by relatives of Nohemi Gonzalez, a U.S. citizen killed by ISIS terrorists in a November 2015 attack at a Paris restaurant. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
For example, the validity of the Canadian patent (CA2461202) has been challenged on several grounds, but without success (Federal Court judgment of January 12, 2021, in BMS v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
Serra v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
If question I is answered to the affirmativeCan a party B validly rely on the priority right claimed in a PCT-application for the purpose of claiming priority rights under Article 87(1) EPCin the case where1) a PCT-application designates party A as applicant for the US only and party B as applicant for other designated States, including regional European patent protection and2) the PCT-application claims priority from an earlier patent application that designates party A as the applicant and3) the… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:02 pm
At 11 a.m. on Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on the constitutionality of the government’s ban on “indecency” on television and radio, in the case of Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:57 am
Another case to watch: Pietrylo v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 2:22 am
The Respondent moved timely in federal court under the ACPA to block transfer of the domain names. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 2:08 am
scrutinizes the recent decision of the Tribunal judiciaire de Paris regarding the interim measures requested in the Total-Ouganda case under French law on corporate duty of care – “loi sur le devoir de vigilance” (TJ Paris, référé, 28 févr. 2023). [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:18 am
Nonetheless, Reed was thought to have had problems with aspects of the holding in Brown v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am
In the Article III context, where a federal regulation is challenged in federal court via petition for review, standing for states can be fraught. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 8:05 am
In addition, 37 CFR 1.6(a)(1) provides “[t]he Patent and Trademark Office is not open for the filing of correspondence on any day that is a Saturday, Sunday or Federal holiday within the District of Columbia” to clarify that any day that is a Saturday, Sunday or Federal holiday within the District of Columbia is a day that the USPTO is not open for the filing of applications within the meaning of Article 4(C)(3) of the Paris Convention. [read post]
