Search for: "People v Abrahams" Results 261 - 280 of 332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 23, 2009)Affirming $1.3M JV (minus $90K remittitur) for sales rep on his disability (bipolar)/failure-to-accommodate claim>> Abraham v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As always, I begin with heartfelt thanks to the people who have actually made this quite remarkable series of gatherings possible. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As a justice, his dissents in Lochner v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
  Exemplary damages for libel were upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of Hill v Church of Scientology ([1995] 2 SCR 1130). [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by John Mikhail
”  This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
In the months before Abraham Lincoln's inauguration in 1861, anti-Lincoln men in Washington plotted to undermine the Union and derail the peaceful transfer of power. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sometimes the heavens fall when people blindly follow rules that no longer serve their original purposes; sometimes the heavens fall when people insouciantly break rules that seem inconvenient at the moment. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
Citing the 1803 landmark case of Marbury v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am by Kali Borkoski
” Justice Garland recalled the Court’s precedent in “NBC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:12 am
Though often reviled as unprincipled and cynical, I believe he may have been one of the most interesting people in the grand march of history, and he certainly led one of the most interesting lives. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Death in Copyright: Remarks on Duration by Abraham Drassinower, University of Toronto Faculty of LawWhat would a rights based account of duration look like? [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But Dinan focuses on something even more important about most of the states: With only one exception (Delaware), they reject what Madison was so proud of in Federalist 63, i.e., the removal from “we the people” of even an iota of an ability to engage in direct governance. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am by John Mikhail
In my previous posts (here and here), I drew attention to the frequently neglected fact that there are, in effect, three Necessary and Proper clauses in the Constitution, and I sketched a number of claims about the origin and meaning of these clauses, highlighting the distinction between the Foregoing Powers and All Other Powers provisions. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
  To be sure, the Complaint characterizes Ranked-Choice Voting as “exotic” and points out that some people find Ranked-Choice Voting ballots complicated. [read post]