Search for: "People v. Spellings" Results 261 - 280 of 1,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 2:43 am by Paul Cruikshank
Lord Neuberger, Sumption and Toulson were of the view that, while previously it was open to the Council to accept a dodgy application, or remedy it themselves, s 67 of the 2006 Act spells out very clearly that: “…an application under section 53(5) of the 1981 Act is made when it is made in accordance with paragraph 1 of Schedule 14 to that Act [requiring a map of a 1:25,000 scale to be attached…]” meaning that an application cannot be made outwith those terms. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 9:23 am by Eric S. Solotoff
This issue was front and center in the unreported (non-precedential) case of Azzolina v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:27 am by Lyle Denniston
Gregory wrote the main opinion for the majority on the constitutional issue, and Circuit Judge Paul V. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm by Ronald Mann
ShareAs I explain in my preview, the question in Bissonnette v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
At least 147 people were sickened, and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:58 pm by Tim Armstrong
At one level, MGE falls into the same category as cases like Lexmark and Chamberlain v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
The only “media case” amongh the five was Novaya Gazeta V Voronezhe v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  Last year, in State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 7:22 pm
., § 280 and as held in People v Jackson, People v Krank, except where time is a material ingredient of the crime the prosecution is not confined in its evidence to the precise date laid in the indictment, but may prove that the offense was committed at any time prior to the commencement of the prosecution and such proof does not constitute a material variance. [read post]