Search for: "People v. Stephens" Results 261 - 280 of 2,875
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2022, 6:07 am by David Pocklington
London Review of Books:The Right to Die: Retired Lord Justice of Appeal Sir Stephen Sedley speculates on the likely progress (or otherwise) of Rob Marris’s Assisted Dying Bill. (9 August 2015). [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
Stephen Kalin reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
The move comes as some Ukrainian steel mills have begun producing again, and the industry employs 1 in 13 Ukrainian people, the Commerce Department said. [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:25 pm by ACLU
At first, few people knew about the ACLU and many who did, despised us. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
What will America become if, as reported, the five most conservative members of the US Supreme Court angrily and emphatically overrule Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:43 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan are sure to dissent. [read post]
4 May 2022, 7:29 am by jonathanturley
No less a legal figure as Stephen Colbert declared “They knew, that if they were honest, they wouldn’t get the job. [read post]
4 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
A further 58 people joined the convoy in a town on the outskirts of Mariupol. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What is most interesting about Fraley’s data, I think, is its demonstration that at least some people somewhere are always talking about court-packing. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
In the leading 1979 case of Parklane Hosiery v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:09 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Politico: “The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But some calls for reform arise more from a felt need to respond to what are seen as abuses of the confirmation process in very recent years.[13]  As is well-known, the Senate refused even to consider President Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland in March 2016, shortly after the death of Justice Scalia in February, on the ground that it was within 8 months of a presidential election and the Senate should wait and “give the people a voice” in the selection of a new… [read post]