Search for: "People v. Washington (1990)"
Results 261 - 280
of 443
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
The Legislative Budget Board, however, proposed a number of additions to this cost, to better take into account the costs of complying with Ruiz v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of LawSleeping Treaty: The Pan-American Trademark ConventionTTAB’s 2000 Belmont case: British-American Tobacco v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 10:03 pm
May 1982. v. 45 (7). [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm
Circuit granted an injunction pending appeal by a 2-1 vote (Judges Henderson and Brown, with Judge Tatel dissenting) in the consolidated Priests for Life and Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Washington cases; and the U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 1:35 am
Lead counsel for the Browns was George Washington University Law Prof. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:03 am
By Kerr's reckoning, their arguments were "essentially playing out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Just watch out when one of us starts blogging about dead people. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
Schepers, who became deaf and daft, and fantasized and testified to conversations with people, long dead, who could not contradict him. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Initiative use ex-ploded in the following decades, reaching a peak of 377 in the 1990s, 177 of which were approved. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 10:50 pm
As many anxiously await the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (TTAB) decision in Blackhorse v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:03 am
, and (2) Are corporations people? [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
(1971) and Albemarle Paper Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:27 am
The ground has shifted underneath the old politics of the 1990s. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:03 pm
Let us all concede: in 1787, the Constitution certainly did not give the federal government any power to tell the states they had to let black people vote. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:07 pm
This case was about giving people a role in the creation of the laws that govern their lives." [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 911 F.2d 941, 958-9 (3d Cir. 1990) (if New Jersey law requires plaintiffs to show that it is more likely than not that Bendectin caused the injury, and if plaintiffs rely solely on epidemiological analysis in order to avoid summary judgment, the relative risk from the epidemiological data relied upon will, at a minimum, have to exceed 2) Daubert v. [read post]
