Search for: "Person v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc." Results 261 - 280 of 378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
Specifically, Greenspring asked the appeals court to follow the Eighth Circuit’s holding in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v RLI Insurance Co. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 12:54 am
The judge said that Wal-Mart's plan, which requires that non-custodial stepchildren live with Wal-Mart employees at least nine months out of the year and that they be claimed on their parents' federal tax returns as dependents to qualify for coverage, runs counter to New York law. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:15 pm
"After reviewing the relevant case law on sound marks (particularly In re General Electric Broadcasting Co., Inc., 199 USPQ 560 (TTAB 1978)), as well as the Supreme Court's decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:15 pm by Fred Goldsmith
On July 7, 2007, Doi’s co-worker picked him up at the Tucson, Arizona, airport and then drove to a Wal-Mart store to purchase food and Pedialyte for work the next day. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm by Ad Law Defense
  In all, the consolidated litigation involves more than 70 companies including grocery stores, coffee companies, food manufacturers and big-box retailers, such as Whole Foods Market, Trader Joe’s Co., Peet’s Coffee & Tea Inc., Nestle USA Inc., Costco Wholesale Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Philip Morris, Inc., ___ P.3d ___, 2009 WL 1563373 (Nev. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:04 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 575 F.3d 1312, 1319- 20 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am by Lyle Denniston
In agreeing to hear Tyson’s case, the Court took no action on a pair of petitions raising similar issues, by the huge retail chain, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 355 F.3d 1327, 1331 (Fed. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am by Aditi Shah
First, because the Ninth Circuit already recognized that some class members in this case may not have a constitutional right to bond hearings, the class may no longer satisfy the Supreme Court’s standard articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]