Search for: "Peters v. Doe" Results 261 - 280 of 3,539
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2007, 6:23 am
Following Peter's post on the High Court decision in IGT v Comptroller [2007] EWHC 1341 (Pat), a November 2006 decision of the European Patent Office ("EPO") Board of Appeal (T 0152/04) has just come to light which holds, in no uncertain terms, that the Court of Appeal decision in Aerotel Ltd. v Telco Holdings Ltd & Ors Rev 1 [2006] EWCA Civ 1371 is bad law. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 8:28 am by Bart van Wezenbeek
Bart van WezenbeekThe Court confirmed that a District court, not specialised in patent matters, does have relative jurisdiction to decide a motion to produce exhibits for determining patent infringement. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
EPA and more in the concerns animating Justice Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 6:48 am
A recent Massachusetts federal court decision, Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:34 am by PaulKostro
REGENCY Co-Op, Inc., BER-C-167-10, Peter E. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
This does not just include the well-publicised incidents involving Premier League superstars. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 4:36 am
Civil Service Law §106 does not authorize an individual to maintain a private cause of action based on alleged violation of the statute Goddard v Martino, 2013 NY Slip Op 23240, Supreme Court, Dutchess County, Justice Peter M. [read post]