Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2011, 3:14 pm
Heasley and Phillip V. [read post]
30 May 2017, 11:58 am
Peruta v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:03 pm
FIESELER v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:45 pm
United States, 714 F.3d 1311,1315 (Fed. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:48 am
Justice Ginsburg immediately pointed out that "the position of the only representative of the United States" in the court below was in fact opposite to the one taken by Ms. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:23 pm
The Colorado state supreme court didn’t accept Phillips’ appeal and his attorneys then petitioned the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:49 am
” The Commissioner also contended that the proper test for determining whether the loan agreements constituted a security was the “family resemblance test” announced by the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:16 am
Phillips, Counsel for Cosgrove Law Group, LLC and former Director of Enforcement for the Missouri Securities Division, Office of the Secretary of State. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 2:16 am
Steven Staker of the Junction City Public Defender Office won in State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:50 pm
Today, he is a litigant in the Supreme Court of the United States and regarded by many as embodying the tension – increasingly, the conflict – between religious conscience and equality. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 5:41 pm
Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney United States Bankruptcy Court Los Angeles Bankruptcy Court Chapter 11 Business Bankruptcy Case: In re Brice Road Developments, LLC 6th Cir. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 4:19 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia charging MCC with one count of knowingly and willfully conspiring to commit major fraud on the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 12:39 pm
On March 6, 2012, Timberridge Presbyterian Church of Atlanta filed a petition for certiorari (review) in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Lord Phillips held that the term “relating to” had to be construed more broadly than the precedents suggested: There is no principle of international law under which state A is immune from proceedings brought in state B in order to enforce a judgment given against it by the courts of state C, where state A did not enjoy immunity in respect of the proceedings that gave rise to that judgment. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:47 am
Citigroup, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:06 am
Phillips, 12-544 and its prisoner-on-top counterpart Phillips v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:50 am
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
Medical Protective Co. v. [read post]
