Search for: "Planned Parenthood v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 1,216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm
   Defend reproductive rights Oppose efforts to defund Planned Parenthood File litigation to challenge any new federal restrictions on abortion access Challenge laws that permit the use of religion to discriminate by allowing health care providers and social service agencies to turn women away when they seek reproductive health care services or information Challenge abortion restrictions at the state level through litigation and advocacy Challenge existing… [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 12:01 am
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm by Melanie Fontes
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:10 am by Lyle Denniston
But when the decision finally emerged in late June 1992 in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
As the Supreme Court observed in its 1992 abortion ruling in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Justice Alito’s draft, which apparently was circulated with the Court on the assumption that the Chief’s vote was not required to make a majority, rejects such a right and would subject all abortion regulations only to so-called “rational-basis” review.Given the (almost certain) desire of Justices Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor to preserve (or expand) abortion rights from where they sit right now under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Planned Parenthood, Justice Thomas chided the Court for declining to review a decision invalidating an Indiana law that prohibited abortions undertaken “solely because of the child’s race, sex, diagnosis of Down syndrome, disability, or related characteristics. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The court concluded:in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the In-Person Requirements cause an undue burden in violation of the Constitution, imposing a substantial obstacle on a large fraction of the relevant women seeking a medication abortion.AP reports on the decision.In Planned Parenthood of Maryland, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:47 am by Matthew Lanahan
At HealthLawProf Blog, Nicole Huberfeld discusses Tuesday’s denial of cert. in Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]