Search for: "Precision Medical, Inc."
Results 261 - 280
of 861
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
EV3, Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
A Plaintiff in the Business Court found itself in precisely this situation. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:07 am
The places where authority is split or where the precise issue has yet to be dealt with. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:50 pm
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 15-3104, 2015 WL 8538119 (6th Cir. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
And the product was a drug, Avandia, not the entirety of the HMO’s medical services. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 2:37 am
The mere fact that there may be other terms which describe more precisely the characteristics of degreasers or scouring preparations, such as ‘degreaser’, ‘grease remover’ or ‘scouring preparations’, does not rule out the application of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 to the word mark sought, given the general interest pursued by that provision. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:03 am
Align Technology, Inc., No. 5:13-cv-02812-EJD, 2015 U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm
Tulsa Winch, Inc., No. 14-5071 (10th Cir. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Caraco Pharmaceutical, Inc., 670 F. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:21 am
That is precisely why plaintiffs are limited to warning defect claims in these cases. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 2:00 pm
Ct. 2466 (2013), to innovator drugs – although the precise subject of that post was preemption of design defect claims involving §510(k) medical devices. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:19 am
Just look at the FDA’s “reference 5” − Defendant’s [FDA’s] Memorandum of Points & Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss or Summary Judgment, Allergan Inc., v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
I describe these decisions as anomalous because they seem to permit precisely what Title VII forbids: treating employees differently on the basis of sex. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 2:24 pm
It will be interesting to see how the FDA continues to regulate drug and medical device promotion on social media platforms in light of the unique nature and appeal of social media to companies and consumers alike. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 5:43 am
Cephalon, Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:16 pm
In so holding, the court found that the naming of the produce company as an additional insured was the precise type of agreement envisioned under § 18, and thus the produce company was immune from suit. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 11:38 am
Phar-Mor, Inc., 336 Ill.App.3d 659670 (2000). [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
Am., Inc., 961 F. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 5:25 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 11:32 am
Textron, Inc., No. 3:10 CV 87, 2014 U.S. [read post]
