Search for: "Quick v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 2,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2008, 10:39 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently held that Major League Baseball's licensing of team logos was subject to rule of reason review under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:19 pm by Wells Bennett
  And what better way to top things off, than with a quick update in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:43 pm
Although urinalysis results may often be sufficiently reliable evidence that the opportunity for crossexamination is unnecessary for due process purposes, see United States v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:03 am
Belmora's FLANAXBased on its reading of the Supreme Court’s Lexmark decision, the lower court had dismissed Bayer’s Section 43(a) false association and false advertising claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) and entered judgment on the pleadings as to Bayer’s Section 14(3) claim, ruling that the Lanham Act does not allow an owner of a foreign mark not registered in the United States, who does not use the mark in the United States [Bayer], to assert… [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
United States (drug felony, misdemeanor, facilitate, cellular phone) Dean, Christopher M. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 6:44 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Monday, October 3 marks the start of the United States Supreme Court's October Term. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 1:29 pm by Farrah Nagrampa
Wainwright, significantly changing the face of criminal law in the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:56 pm by B.W. Barnett
Believe it or not, every defendant has the right to subpoena witnesses to appear at trial on his behalf, whether they want to appear or not.What follows is a quick summary of the compulsory process for Texas defendants, taken from Clark v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:47 am
United States in a post here called “Practice Pointer: Navigating a Novel Cert. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Kollective is a Korean company that had exclusive rights to some Korean pop music recordings in the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:33 am by Orin Kerr
United States, 355 U.S. 66, 74, 78 S.Ct. 128, 133, 2 L.Ed.2d 95 (1957); United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 7:47 am by Eric Goldman
Also: It is difficult to conceive of how online user reviews – at least in their current form – could continue to exist in the United States without Section 230. [read post]