Search for: "Ramirez v. Ins*"
Results 261 - 280
of 555
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2015, 6:41 am
Guatemala and the “Mapiripán Massacre” v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 6:41 am
Guatemala and the “Mapiripán Massacre” v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:54 pm
In Sinclair v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:21 pm
Sean also summarized key points from yesterday's decision by the Supreme Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 4:16 am
The California Third District Court of Appeals, in Ramirez v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:37 am
Ramirez was undertaken despite the threats that were directed at him and the ACLU. [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:30 am
**Rejecting Claimant’s argument to the contrary, the Appellate Division said that the appointing authority “was not obligated to offer [Claimant] a part-time position as a laborer,” following his termination from his heavy equipment operator position, citing Matter of Ramirez [Commissioner of Labor], 84 AD3d at 1657.* See, for example, Matter of Cravatta v New York State Dept. of Transp., 77 AD3d 1399; Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70… [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am
ERMA GONZALES RAMIREZ, INDIVIDUALLY, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RAYMOND RAMIREZ, DECEASED, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF R.L.R., J.R., M.R., R.R., AND D.R., MINOR CHILDREN; JANIE CROSBY; AND SAMUEL LEE JACKSON, INDIVIDUALLY, AS NEXT FRIEND OF T.C.J., A MI, No. 14-0107 Per Curiam ANDREWS COUNTY, TEXAS, ANDREWS INDUSTRIAL FOUNDATION, AND ANDREWS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004)(“[T]he presumptive rule against warrantless searches applies with equal force to searches whose only defect is a lack of particularity in the warrant. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:01 pm
“Se a gente quiser modificar alguma coisa, é pelas crianças que devemos começar, por meio da educação” Todos sabem que o dia primeiro de maio marca a memória de muitos brasileiros e de amantes do automobilismo ao redor do mundo. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:26 am
And that is precisely what the Supreme Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Likewise, the circumstances of some shootings, by their nature, can establish the defendant’s intent to cause serious physical injury (see, People v Vigliotti, 270 AD2d 904 [4th Dept 2000] [victim shot in chest from two feet or less during argument with defendant; proof sufficient to establish intent to cause serious physical injury]; People v Ramirez, 182 AD2d 569 [1st Dept 1992] [same]; People v Dukes, 30 AD3d 682 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot in back… [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
Here are the latest four InFuse victories.Truthful v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
”Last year the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board issued a significant panel decision, Patterson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:01 pm
“Se a gente quiser modificar alguma coisa, é pelas crianças que devemos começar, por meio da educação” Ayrton Senna Todos sabem que o dia primeiro de maio marca a memória de muitos brasileiros e de amantes do automobilismo ao redor do mundo. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:41 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:27 am
This was most squarely dealt with by the federal court in its explicit rejection of another one of the few InFuse cases on the red side of the ledger, Ramirez v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm
Was the jury properly instructed? [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
See Groh v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 4:28 pm
(holding objection that summary judgment affidavit was conclusory was not waived even though the objecting party failed to obtain a ruling from the trial court); Ramirez v. [read post]
