Search for: "Responding to Negative Online Reviews"
Results 261 - 280
of 831
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Tribe penned a Washington Post op-ed perceptively asserting that “Roberts’ Approach Could End Up Being More Protective of Abortion Rights, Not Less,” Mary Ziegler responded in the negative, stating that “Roberts transformed the undue burden test, making it far less protective of abortion rights. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 12:51 pm
. ***** ABA Offers Ethical Guidance on Responding to Negative Online Reviews Now that we live in a digital world, online reviews are becoming increasingly useful tools for consumers. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 12:52 pm
Employees have the right to review or receive a copy of their personnel records on request, and employers must notify employees if negative information is put into their personnel records. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 2:53 pm
More than a decade after clients started leaving attorney reviews online, the ABA has now steps in to offer ethical guidance on Responding to Online Criticism, Formal Opinion 496. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 8:11 am
As such, lawyers must be careful not to violate the duty of confidentiality when responding to negative online reviews. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
Lin Wood is tossed from defamation case for 'mendacity' and 'surprising incompetence'Amazon slams Parler in court reply and invokes Big Tech's liability shieldYouTube suspends Trump's channel for 7 daysLawyers must use caution when responding to negative online reviews, new ethics opinion saysSee historic moment House reaches enough votes to impeach TrumpUS Supreme Court reinstates requirement for women seeking abortion drug to get it… [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:01 am
What were other possible outcomes (both more positive and more negative) and what key junctures and actions could have facilitated or averted them? [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 7:00 am
However, the online vote had yet to begin. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 8:03 am
, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy (October 23, 2020): attempts to regulate online platforms to exclude the facilitation of sex work appear to have had negative consequences at least according to research conducted within the sex work community. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 3:58 am
Transcript [0:20] Marlene Gebauer: Welcome to The Geek In Review. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:43 am
Annual Compliance Review. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:42 am
” The result of the exclusions appears to be that the John Lewis customer review section would now be out of scope, but a site such as Mumsnet would still be in scope. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 5:31 am
As a result, in or about 2018, Chaker posted negative online reviews about Respondent. 5. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Lawyers are breaking down legal work into more basic tasks, and finding alternative ways of sourcing the more routine and repetitive work, such as document review in litigation, due diligence work, routine contract drafting, and rudimentary legal research. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 7:10 am
The employer also argued that it refused to offer the job to the employee because her supervisor gave the employee a negative review. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 11:00 pm
In the pandemic we can meet online using FaceTime or talk on the phone, by text and email. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
After that I’ll review a number of cases with not necessarily much of a throughline, though I have some larger thoughts about various topics. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:00 pm
["Underhill was disciplined for publicly responding to former clients’ negative online reviews with internet postings that disclosed sensitive and confidential information obtained during the representation. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 1:26 pm
Online reviews are important to marketing, and as a lawyer, you have ethical limitations to operate within as you consider how to source positive reviews and respond to negative ones. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 11:34 am
Some local representatives may now respond to such government demands, and can potentially be subject to retaliation for non-compliance with a disproportionate order. [read post]
