Search for: "Robert P. Cross"
Results 261 - 280
of 572
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
McWilliams' report, p. 2], the church laws trump. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm
Erica P. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
But the line is crossed by using or attempting to use the information against the Ex to 'get 'em over a barrel.' Moreover, threats to file a civil action (e.g. an emergency Domestic Violence Restraining Order) unless a party's demands are met do not themselves violate any statute or disciplinary rule. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
Barrett’s opinion was not undermined during his lengthy cross-examination. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
On cross-examination, the defense pressed the point: Q. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:15 am
Roberts, Michael, Encompassing Empowerment in Ritual, War, and Assassination: Tantric Principles in Tamil Tiger Instrumentalities, at p. 88. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:58 pm
” (p.8). [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm
However, other authority suggests that the rule rejects the common law requirement that death actually occur, 2 Brandis & Broun at 921 n.670; Robert P. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 10:30 am
See pages 10-11 (Chief Justice Roberts), 19-20 (Justice Kagan), 39 (Justice Alito). [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
(For a readable and insightful review of academic freedom in the American context by two law professors, see For The Common Good, by Matthew Finkin and Robert Post, Yale University Press, 2009. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
For instance, back in 1985, Robert Levinson complained of a contract with the Eckerd Foundation for the management of the Okeechobee School for Boys in which “[v]irtually every” contract item concerned input activities and pertained to administrative/operational functions. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 11:29 am
Cross posted with permission from the IAPP Privacy Advisor. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am
P (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v Cheshire West and Chester Council, and P & Anor (by their litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Surrey County Council, heard 21 – 23 October 2013. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
Robert Welch, Inc., the Supreme Court held that even a private figure must prove, at least, that a false fact was uttered negligently to prevail on a defamation claim. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:58 am
A Multidisciplinary Discussion" -- Zachary P. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
Professor Robert Thomas, commenting on the United Kingdom experience, has captured well the nature of the transition to active adjudication: …tribunals have developed a more inquisitorial approach, but they have not totally rejected the adversarial approach; rather, they have applied an inquisitorial gloss to a basically adversarial process. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Uebler, Esquire, Robert L. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[33] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no real margin of error, and the cost of error can be death. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm
”[29] As few as twenty organisms have been said to be sufficient to infect a person and, as a result, possibly kill them.[30] And unlike generic E. coli, the O157:H7 serotype multiplies at temperatures up to 44° Fahrenheit, survives freezing and thawing, is heat resistant, grows at temperatures up to 111° Fahrenheit, resists drying, and can survive exposure to acidic environments.[31] And, finally, to make it even more of a dangerous threat, E. coli O157:H7 bacteria are… [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:11 am
Sex Offender Registry Bd., 11–P–1700 (Mass. [read post]
